These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32157639)
21. Selective memory retrieval can impair and improve retrieval of other memories. Bäuml KH; Samenieh A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):488-94. PubMed ID: 21942495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis. Rawson KA; Vaughn KE; Carpenter SK Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):619-33. PubMed ID: 25344296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Control processes in short-term storage: Retrieval strategies in immediate recall depend upon the number of words to be recalled. Ward G; Tan L Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):658-682. PubMed ID: 30617748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall. Siegel LL; Kahana MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 24564545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of linguistic labels on source-monitoring decisions. Geraci L; Franklin N Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):571-85. PubMed ID: 15615316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there a detrimental effect on order information? Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):367-94. PubMed ID: 10428684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The critical importance of timing of retrieval practice for the fate of nonretrieved memories. Kriechbaum VM; Bäuml KT Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6128. PubMed ID: 37061553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: implications for the processing of unattended sound. Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 23681014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Anderson MC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):522-30. PubMed ID: 11082860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing. McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Bugg JM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 26237617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Part-list cuing can impair, improve, or not influence recall performance: The critical roles of encoding and access to study context at test. Lehmer EM; Bäuml KT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1186-1200. PubMed ID: 29578736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Revisiting von Restorff's early isolation effect. Schmidt SR; Schmidt CR Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 27631791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting. Bäuml KH; Hartinger A Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 11958725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dissociating the two faces of selective memory retrieval. Dobler IM; Bäuml KH Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 22639961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of verbal labels on flexible memory retrieval at 12-months of age. Taylor G; Liu H; Herbert JS Infant Behav Dev; 2016 Nov; 45(Pt A):11-17. PubMed ID: 27564220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial retrieval shields against retrieval-induced forgetting. Racsmány M; Keresztes A Front Psychol; 2015; 6():657. PubMed ID: 26052293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material. McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]