BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32157777)

  • 1. Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.
    Bird M; Ouellette C; Whitmore C; Li L; Nair K; McGillion MH; Yost J; Banfield L; Campbell E; Carroll SL
    Health Expect; 2020 Jun; 23(3):523-539. PubMed ID: 32157777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.
    Karlsson AW; Kragh-Sørensen A; Børgesen K; Behrens KE; Andersen T; Kidholm ML; Rothmann MJ; Ketelaar M; Janssens A
    Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Jun; 9(1):43. PubMed ID: 37322525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.
    Béland S; Lambert M; Delahunty-Pike A; Howse D; Schwarz C; Chouinard MC; Aubrey-Bassler K; Burge F; Doucet S; Danish A; Dumont-Samson O; Bisson M; Luke A; Macdonald M; Gaudreau A; Porter J; Rubenstein D; Sabourin V; Scott C; Warren M; Wilhelm L; Hudon C
    Health Expect; 2022 Oct; 25(5):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 35593113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships.
    Tittlemier BJ; Cooper J; Steliga D; Woodgate RL; Sibley KM
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2022 Jun; 20(1):69. PubMed ID: 35717196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.
    Dong SY; Nguyen L; Cross A; Doherty-Kirby A; Geboers J; McCauley D; Soper AK; St Dennis A; Steeves D; Trehan N; Gorter JW
    Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Jul; 9(1):50. PubMed ID: 37430378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to engage patient partners in health service research: a scoping review protocol.
    Tscherning SC; Bekker HL; Vedelø TW; Finderup J; Rodkjær LØ
    Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Apr; 7(1):20. PubMed ID: 33902753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conceptualising the initiation of researcher and research user partnerships: a meta-narrative review.
    Zych MM; Berta WB; Gagliardi AR
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Feb; 18(1):24. PubMed ID: 32070367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.
    Rees S; Williams A
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.
    Hoekstra F; Mrklas KJ; Khan M; McKay RC; Vis-Dunbar M; Sibley KM; Nguyen T; Graham ID; ; Gainforth HL
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 32450919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.
    Harrison JD; Auerbach AD; Anderson W; Fagan M; Carnie M; Hanson C; Banta J; Symczak G; Robinson E; Schnipper J; Wong C; Weiss R
    Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 30761699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Fox G; Fergusson DA; Nicholls SG; Smith M; Stacey D; Lalu MM
    Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Jun; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 35668479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the "how" in research partnerships with young partners by experience: lessons learned in six projects from Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.
    Nguyen L; van Oort B; Davis H; van der Meulen E; Dawe-McCord C; Franklin A; Gorter JW; Morris C; Ketelaar M
    Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Nov; 8(1):62. PubMed ID: 36397131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership.
    Cadel L; Marcinow M; Sandercock J; Dowedoff P; Guilcher SJT; Maybee A; Law S; Kuluski K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257880. PubMed ID: 34587175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The power of language: how to bridge the gap between healthcare research and patients - a scoping review.
    Dews SA; Daley R; Bansal A; Preston J; Bohm N
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2024 Feb; 40(2):279-291. PubMed ID: 38131338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient partners' perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews: A patient-oriented rapid review.
    Boden C; Edmonds AM; Porter T; Bath B; Dunn K; Gerrard A; Goodridge D; Stobart C
    Health Expect; 2021 Aug; 24(4):1056-1071. PubMed ID: 34048618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary.
    McCarron TL; Clement F; Rasiah J; Moffat K; Wasylak T; Santana MJ
    Res Involv Engagem; 2021 May; 7(1):25. PubMed ID: 33971974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.
    McCarron TL; Clement F; Rasiah J; Moran C; Moffat K; Gonzalez A; Wasylak T; Santana M
    Health Expect; 2021 Aug; 24(4):1378-1390. PubMed ID: 34153165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review.
    Ellis U; Kitchin V; Vis-Dunbar M
    J Particip Med; 2021 Jun; 13(2):e27141. PubMed ID: 34110293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What guidance exists to support patient partner compensation practices? A scoping review of available policies and guidelines.
    Fox G; Fergusson DA; Sadeknury A; Nicholls SG; Smith M; Stacey D; Lalu MM
    Health Expect; 2024 Feb; 27(1):e13970. PubMed ID: 38865184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.