These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32159521)

  • 1. Quantitative Screening of Cervical Cancers for Low-Resource Settings: Pilot Study of Smartphone-Based Endoscopic Visual Inspection After Acetic Acid Using Machine Learning Techniques.
    Bae JK; Roh HJ; You JS; Kim K; Ahn Y; Askaruly S; Park K; Yang H; Jang GJ; Moon KH; Jung W
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e16467. PubMed ID: 32159521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smartphone Use for Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Countries: A Pilot Study Conducted in Madagascar.
    Catarino R; Vassilakos P; Scaringella S; Undurraga-Malinverno M; Meyer-Hamme U; Ricard-Gauthier D; Matute JC; Petignat P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134309. PubMed ID: 26222772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internal validation of Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE) on smartphone images for cervical cancer screening in a prospective study in Zambia.
    Hu L; Mwanahamuntu MH; Sahasrabuddhe VV; Barrett C; Horning MP; Shah I; Laverriere Z; Banik D; Ji Y; Shibemba AL; Chisele S; Munalula MK; Kaunga F; Musonda F; Malyangu E; Hariharan KM; Parham GP
    Cancer Med; 2024 Jun; 13(11):e7355. PubMed ID: 38872398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PERFORMANCE OF SMARTPHONE-BASED DIGITAL IMAGES FOR CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING IN A LOW-RESOURCE CONTEXT.
    Tran PL; Benski C; Viviano M; Petignat P; Combescure C; Jinoro J; Herinianasolo JL; Vassilakos P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):337-342. PubMed ID: 29921339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep learning-based image evaluation for cervical precancer screening with a smartphone targeting low resource settings - Engineering approach.
    Hu L; Horning MP; Banik D; Ajenifuja OK; Adepiti CA; Yeates K; Mtema Z; Wilson B; Mehanian C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1944-1949. PubMed ID: 33018383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Smartphone Images of the Cervix After Acetic Acid Application for Diagnosing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Greater in Women With Positive Cervical Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Allanson ER; Phoolcharoen N; Salcedo MP; Fellman B; Schmeler KM
    JCO Glob Oncol; 2021 Dec; 7():1711-1721. PubMed ID: 34936374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep learning based cervical screening by the cross-modal integration of colposcopy, cytology, and HPV test.
    Fu L; Xia W; Shi W; Cao GX; Ruan YT; Zhao XY; Liu M; Niu SM; Li F; Gao X
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Mar; 159():104675. PubMed ID: 34979436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening and screening-triage strategies among women living with HIV-1 in Burkina Faso and South Africa: A cohort study.
    Kelly HA; Chikandiwa A; Sawadogo B; Gilham C; Michelow P; Lompo OG; Omar T; Zan S; Magooa P; Segondy M; Nagot N; Meda N; Delany-Moretlwe S; Mayaud P;
    PLoS Med; 2021 Mar; 18(3):e1003528. PubMed ID: 33661957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Screen and Treat" Approach among VIA Positive Women during Cervical Cancer Screening Program: Experience at Low Resource Setting.
    Shahnaz S; Hira HM; Begum KN; Akhter R; Sharmin S
    Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1100-1106. PubMed ID: 34605483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Community-Based Screening for Cervical Cancer Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid: Results and Lessons Learned From a Pilot Study in Vietnam.
    Vu LTH; Tran HTD; Nguyen BT; Bui HTT; Nguyen AD; Pham NB
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24 Suppl 2():S3-S8. PubMed ID: 29369251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
    William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Smartphones as Adjuvant Tools for Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Settings.
    Ricard-Gauthier D; Wisniak A; Catarino R; van Rossum AF; Meyer-Hamme U; Negulescu R; Scaringella S; Jinoro J; Vassilakos P; Petignat P
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Oct; 19(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 26247260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening.
    Hu L; Bell D; Antani S; Xue Z; Yu K; Horning MP; Gachuhi N; Wilson B; Jaiswal MS; Befano B; Long LR; Herrero R; Einstein MH; Burk RD; Demarco M; Gage JC; Rodriguez AC; Wentzensen N; Schiffman M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Sep; 111(9):923-932. PubMed ID: 30629194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A study of cervical cancer screening algorithms].
    Zhao FH; Zhang WH; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Chen W; Liu B; Ma JF; Hu SY; Qiao YL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 32(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 20819481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability of a smartphone-compatible, confocal micro-endoscope for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited settings.
    Kadama-Makanga P; Semeere A; Laker-Oketta M; Mubiru M; Lukande R; Huchko M; Freeman E; Kulkarni N; Martin J; Kang D; Nakalembe M
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):483. PubMed ID: 39223605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating smartphone strategies for reliability, reproducibility, and quality of VIA for cervical cancer screening in the Shiselweni region of Eswatini: A cohort study.
    Asgary R; Staderini N; Mthethwa-Hleta S; Lopez Saavedra PA; Garcia Abrego L; Rusch B; Marie Luce T; Rusike Pasipamire L; Ndlangamandla M; Beideck E; Kerschberger B
    PLoS Med; 2020 Nov; 17(11):e1003378. PubMed ID: 33211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of colposcopy vs cytology as secondary test to triage women found positive on visual inspection test.
    Pimple SA; Amin G; Goswami S; Shastri SS
    Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20587908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application and Clinical Value of Machine Learning-Based Cervical Cancer Diagnosis and Prediction Model in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Center, Controlled, Non-Arbitrary Size Case-Control Study.
    Wang Y; Shen L; Jin J; Wang G
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():2432291. PubMed ID: 35821886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study protocol for a two-site clinical trial to validate a smartphone-based artificial intelligence classifier identifying cervical precancer and cancer in HPV-positive women in Cameroon.
    Baleydier I; Vassilakos P; Viñals R; Wisniak A; Kenfack B; Tsuala Fouogue J; Enownchong Enow Orock G; Lemoupa Makajio S; Foguem Tincho E; Undurraga M; Cattin M; Makohliso S; Schönenberger K; Gervaix A; Thiran JP; Petignat P
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260776. PubMed ID: 34914727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India.
    Arbyn M; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Keita N; Dolo A; Mbalawa CG; Nouhou H; Sakande B; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Sharma A; Shastri S; Basu P
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Jul; 123(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 18404671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.