312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32159594)
1. Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation.
Andrade Junior N; Hida WT; Messias AMV; Lyra JM; Silva CAM; Alves MR
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2020; 83(2):141-145. PubMed ID: 32159594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
Engren AL; Behndig A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 23395354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of astigmatism prediction error taken with the Pentacam measurements, Baylor nomogram, and Barrett formula for toric intraocular lens implantation.
Park DY; Lim DH; Hwang S; Hyun J; Chung TY
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):156. PubMed ID: 28836956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraocular Lens Power Selection after Radial Keratotomy: Topography, Manual, and IOLMaster Keratometry Results Using Haigis Formulas.
Geggel HS
Ophthalmology; 2015 May; 122(5):897-902. PubMed ID: 25601534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes of ocular biometry in eyes with posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.
Kayhan B; Coskunseven E
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Apr; 45(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 35093264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of toric intraocular lens implantation after adjusting for anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens sphere equivalent power effects.
Goggin M; Moore S; Esterman A
Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 129(8):998-1003. PubMed ID: 21825183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula.
Haigis W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1658-63. PubMed ID: 18812114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Keratometry obtained by corneal mapping versus the IOLMaster in the prediction of postoperative refraction in routine cataract surgery.
Dulku S; Smith HB; Antcliff RJ
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013; 41(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 22594695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Pentacam equivalent keratometry reading and IOL Master keratometry measurement in intraocular lens power calculations.
Karunaratne N
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 41(9):825-34. PubMed ID: 23601493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for IOL power calculation.
Aksoy M; Asena L; Güngör SG; Küçüködük A; Akman A
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):2205-2212. PubMed ID: 33733281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.
Cheng H; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 32297050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.
Wang JK; Hu CY; Chang SW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 18242451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of endocyclophotocoagulation on refractive outcomes in angle-closure eyes after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
Wang JC; Campos-Möller X; Shah M; Sheybani A; Ahmed II
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 26948788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation.
Rodriguez-Raton A; Jimenez-Alvarez M; Arteche-Limousin L; Mediavilla-Peña E; Larrucea-Martinez I
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25655597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
