These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32160229)

  • 1. A simple model suggesting economically rational sample-size choice drives irreproducibility.
    Braganza O
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229615. PubMed ID: 32160229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
    Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are most published research findings false in a continuous universe?
    Neves K; Tan PB; Amaral OB
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277935. PubMed ID: 36538521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing the number and size of sites: an economic approach to the optimal design of cluster samples.
    Connelly LB
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):544-59. PubMed ID: 14500052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining sample size when assessing mean equivalence.
    Asberg A; Solem KB; Mikkelsen G
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Nov; 74(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 25228313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-sample
    Tan YD
    Int J Biostat; 2023 May; 19(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 35749155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size determination for equivalence test using rate ratio of sensitivity and specificity in paired sample data.
    Lui KJ; Cumberland WG
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Aug; 22(4):373-89. PubMed ID: 11514039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling test size while gaining the benefits of an internal pilot design.
    Coffey CS; Muller KE
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):625-31. PubMed ID: 11414593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty.
    Anderson SF; Kelley K; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1547-1562. PubMed ID: 28902575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Funnel plots may show asymmetry in the absence of publication bias with continuous outcomes dependent on baseline risk: presentation of a new publication bias test.
    Doleman B; Freeman SC; Lund JN; Williams JP; Sutton AJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):522-534. PubMed ID: 32362052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.
    Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
    Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some thoughts on sample size: a Bayesian-frequentist hybrid approach.
    Gordon Lan KK; Wittes JT
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 22865839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More about the basic assumptions of t-test: normality and sample size.
    Kim TK; Park JH
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 72(4):331-335. PubMed ID: 30929413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.