These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32160817)
1. Investigating the effects of ongoing-task bias on prospective memory. Strickland L; Loft S; Heathcote A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1495-1513. PubMed ID: 32160817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Racing to remember: A theory of decision control in event-based prospective memory. Strickland L; Loft S; Remington RW; Heathcote A Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):851-887. PubMed ID: 30080068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks. Mello B; Matos P; Albuquerque PB Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38632149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors. Matos P; Santos FH; Albuquerque PB Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 32043427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory. Lourenço JS; White K; Maylor EA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1757-64. PubMed ID: 23834056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective memory decision control: A computational model of context effects on prospective memory. Strickland L; Bowden V; Loft S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 37079843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective memory in the red zone: Cognitive control and capacity sharing in a complex, multi-stimulus task. Strickland L; Elliott D; Wilson MD; Loft S; Neal A; Heathcote A J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):695-715. PubMed ID: 30985156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allowing brief delays in responding improves event-based prospective memory for young adults living with HIV disease. Loft S; Doyle KL; Naar-King S; Outlaw AY; Nichols SL; Weber E; Casaletto KB; Woods SP J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(7):761-72. PubMed ID: 25116075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both? Rummel J; Smeekens BA; Kane MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1047-1062. PubMed ID: 27936845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach. Kurtz M; Scherbaum S; Walser M; Kanske P; Möschl M Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1590-1613. PubMed ID: 35212979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a better understanding of costs in prospective memory: A meta-analytic review. Anderson FT; Strube MJ; McDaniel MA Psychol Bull; 2019 Nov; 145(11):1053-1081. PubMed ID: 31464456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]