These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32160871)

  • 1. Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry.
    Dos Santos MBF; Agostini BA; Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Sarkis-Onofre R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 32160871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
    van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics.
    Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Page MJ; Tricco AC; Moher D; Sarkis-Onofre R
    J Dent; 2019 Mar; 82():71-84. PubMed ID: 30716451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of the value of requesting information from drug manufacturers for systematic reviews; 9 years of experience from the drug effectiveness review project.
    McDonagh MS; Thakurta S; Peterson K
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):172. PubMed ID: 30348228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsujimoto H; Kataoka Y; Kimachi M; Shimizu S; Ikenoue T; Fukuma S; Yamamoto Y; Fukuhara S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():54-60. PubMed ID: 28242481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews in restorative dentistry: discussing relevant aspects.
    Sarkis-Onofre R; Pereira-Cenci T; Tricco AC; Demarco FF; Moher D; Cenci MS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 May; 31(3):222-232. PubMed ID: 30821908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
    Ross A; Rankin J; Beaman J; Murray K; Sinnett P; Riddle R; Haskins J; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Page MJ; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Sampson M; Tricco AC; Catalá-López F; Li L; Reid EK; Sarkis-Onofre R; Moher D
    PLoS Med; 2016 May; 13(5):e1002028. PubMed ID: 27218655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers.
    Tawfik GM; Giang HTN; Ghozy S; Altibi AM; Kandil H; Le HH; Eid PS; Radwan I; Makram OM; Hien TTT; Sherif M; Hossain AS; Thang TLL; Puljak L; Salem H; Numair T; Moji K; Huy NT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 32842968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review versus structured critical analysis.
    Solow R
    Cranio; 2021 May; 39(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 31088221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
    Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study.
    Helbach J; Pieper D; Mathes T; Rombey T; Zeeb H; Allers K; Hoffmann F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):230. PubMed ID: 35987985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines.
    Scott J; Howard B; Sinnett P; Schiesel M; Baker J; Henderson P; Vassar M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1828-1835. PubMed ID: 28623004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication bias in randomized controlled trials in dentistry. What factors affect statistical significance of outcomes?
    Mikelis F; Tzanetakis GN; Eliades T; Koletsi D
    J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104183. PubMed ID: 35690226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process.
    van der Braak K; Heus P; Orelio C; Netterström-Wedin F; Robinson KA; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2023 Dec; 12(1):234. PubMed ID: 38098085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.