190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32160894)
1. Diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound and quantitative and qualitative real-time shear wave elastography in musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors.
Li A; Peng XJ; Ma Q; Dong Y; Mao CL; Hu Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 15(1):103. PubMed ID: 32160894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography.
Yang H; Xu Y; Zhao Y; Yin J; Chen Z; Huang P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):930. PubMed ID: 32993571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of soft tissue tumours with ultrasound, shear wave elastography and MRI.
Winn N; Baldwin J; Cassar-Pullicino V; Cool P; Ockendon M; Tins B; Jaremko JL
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Jun; 49(6):869-881. PubMed ID: 31897519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography in Solid Small (≤4 cm) Renal Parenchymal Masses.
Cai Y; Li F; Li Z; Du L; Wu R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):2328-2337. PubMed ID: 31196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do quantitative and qualitative shear wave elastography have a role in evaluating musculoskeletal soft tissue masses?
Pass B; Jafari M; Rowbotham E; Hensor EM; Gupta H; Robinson P
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):723-731. PubMed ID: 27277260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonoelastography for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of superficial soft tissue lesions: a feasibility study.
Magarelli N; Carducci C; Bucalo C; Filograna L; Rapisarda S; De Waure C; Dell'Atti C; Maccauro G; Leone A; Bonomo L
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):566-73. PubMed ID: 24272225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems.
Ren WW; Li XL; He YP; Li DD; Wang D; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW; Xu HX
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of Shear Wave Elastography in the Diagnosis of Gouty and Non-Gouty Arthritis.
Tang Y; Yan F; Yang Y; Xiang X; Wang L; Zhang L; Qiu L
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):884-892. PubMed ID: 28187927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear-Wave Elastography of Benign versus Malignant Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Masses: Comparison with Conventional US and MRI.
Tavare AN; Alfuraih AM; Hensor EMA; Astrinakis E; Gupta H; Robinson P
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):410-417. PubMed ID: 30480491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of the Strain Ratio on Ultrasonic Elastography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors.
Hahn S; Lee YH; Lee SH; Suh JS
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 27918075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum Value Measured by 2-D Shear Wave Elastography Helps in Differentiating Malignancy from Benign Focal Liver Lesions.
Tian WS; Lin MX; Zhou LY; Pan FS; Huang GL; Wang W; Lu MD; Xie XY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2156-66. PubMed ID: 27283039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of region of interest (ROI) size on the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in differentiating solid breast lesions.
Moon JH; Hwang JY; Park JS; Koh SH; Park SY
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jun; 59(6):657-663. PubMed ID: 28899126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of shear wave elastography to detect papillary thyroid carcinoma in thyroid nodules: efficacy of the standard deviation elasticity.
Kim HJ; Kwak MK; Choi IH; Jin SY; Park HK; Byun DW; Suh K; Yoo MH
Korean J Intern Med; 2019 Jul; 34(4):850-857. PubMed ID: 29466846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findings.
Chen YL; Gao Y; Chang C; Wang F; Zeng W; Chen JJ
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Apr; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29622044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stiffness in breast masses with posterior acoustic shadowing: significance of ultrasound real time shear wave elastography.
Luo H; Li J; Shi Y; Xiao X; Wang Y; Wei Z; Xu J
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Apr; 22(1):71. PubMed ID: 35430798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic value of ultrasound and shear wave elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.
Ozturk M; Selcuk MB; Polat AV; Ozbalci AB; Baris YS
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Nov; 49(11):1795-1805. PubMed ID: 32506224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography.
Desmots F; Fakhry N; Mancini J; Reyre A; Vidal V; Jacquier A; Santini L; Moulin G; Varoquaux A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 26617244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
