These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32160895)

  • 1. Learning from Sisyphus: time to rethink our current, ineffective strategy on neurodevelopmental environmental toxicants.
    Takser L; Hunting DJ
    Environ Health; 2020 Mar; 19(1):31. PubMed ID: 32160895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overview of neurotoxicology.
    Tilson HA
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2001 May; Chapter 11():Unit11.1. PubMed ID: 20957638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developmental neurotoxicity - challenges in the 21st century and in vitro opportunities.
    Smirnova L; Hogberg HT; Leist M; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2014; 31(2):129-56. PubMed ID: 24687333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of developmental neurotoxicity induced by chemical mixtures using an adverse outcome pathway concept.
    Pistollato F; de Gyves EM; Carpi D; Bopp SK; Nunes C; Worth A; Bal-Price A
    Environ Health; 2020 Feb; 19(1):23. PubMed ID: 32093744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals: example lists and criteria for their selection and use.
    Aschner M; Ceccatelli S; Daneshian M; Fritsche E; Hasiwa N; Hartung T; Hogberg HT; Leist M; Li A; Mundi WR; Padilla S; Piersma AH; Bal-Price A; Seiler A; Westerink RH; Zimmer B; Lein PJ
    ALTEX; 2017; 34(1):49-74. PubMed ID: 27452664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of analysis of ratios of indices of toxic and sensory effect of chemicals].
    Novikov SM; Shashina TA
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (6):78-80. PubMed ID: 24624828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Windows of sensitivity to toxic chemicals in the motor effects development.
    Ingber SZ; Pohl HR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Feb; 74():93-104. PubMed ID: 26686904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory as a method to predict cumulative neurotoxicity.
    Melnikov F; Geohagen BC; Gavin T; LoPachin RM; Anastas PT; Coish P; Herr DW
    Neurotoxicology; 2020 Jul; 79():95-103. PubMed ID: 32380191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET) for creating a developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT) roadmap for regulatory purposes.
    Crofton K; Fritsche E; Ylikomi T; Bal-Price A
    ALTEX; 2014; 31(2):223-4. PubMed ID: 24794006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals].
    Labie D
    Med Sci (Paris); 2007 Oct; 23(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 17937897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing novel in vitro methods for the risk assessment of developmental and placental toxicants in the environment.
    Fry RC; Bangma J; Szilagyi J; Rager JE
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2019 Sep; 378():114635. PubMed ID: 31233757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sea urchin embryos and larvae as biosensors for neurotoxicants.
    Buznikov GA; Slotkin TA; Lauder JM
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2003; Chapter 1():Unit1.6. PubMed ID: 23045086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toxic encephalopathy.
    Dobbs MR
    Semin Neurol; 2011 Apr; 31(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 21590623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive Analyses and Prioritization of Tox21 10K Chemicals Affecting Mitochondrial Function by in-Depth Mechanistic Studies.
    Xia M; Huang R; Shi Q; Boyd WA; Zhao J; Sun N; Rice JR; Dunlap PE; Hackstadt AJ; Bridge MF; Smith MV; Dai S; Zheng W; Chu PH; Gerhold D; Witt KL; DeVito M; Freedman JH; Austin CP; Houck KA; Thomas RS; Paules RS; Tice RR; Simeonov A
    Environ Health Perspect; 2018 Jul; 126(7):077010. PubMed ID: 30059008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a neurotoxic equivalence scheme of relative potency for assessing the risk of PCB mixtures.
    Simon T; Britt JK; James RC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 48(2):148-70. PubMed ID: 17475378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
    Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimising testing strategies for classification of human health and environmental hazards - A proof-of-concept study.
    Da Silva E; Baun A; Berggren E; Worth A
    Toxicol Lett; 2020 Dec; 335():64-70. PubMed ID: 33098906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rethink how chemical hazards are tested.
    Warner JC; Ludwig JK
    Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7616):269-70. PubMed ID: 27535519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chemical testing strategies for predicting health hazards to children.
    Lamb JC; Brown SM
    Reprod Toxicol; 2000; 14(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 10825671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiological modes of action across species and toxicants: the key to predictive ecotoxicology.
    Ashauer R; Jager T
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29090718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.