These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32161628)
1. How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? Fernandez-Llimos F; Salgado TM; Tonin FS; Pharm Pract (Granada); 2020; 18(1):1804. PubMed ID: 32161628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manuscript Submission Invitations from 'Predatory Journals': What Should Authors Do? Kebede M; Schmaus-Klughammer AE; Tekle BT J Korean Med Sci; 2017 May; 32(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 28378541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary. Tarkang EE; Bain LE Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Beall J Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Feb; 98(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 26829665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. Lamb CR; Adams CA Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.]. Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication. Masten Y; Ashcraft A FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Nov; 364(21):. PubMed ID: 29040536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition. Cejas C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blind versus nonblind review: survey of selected medical journals. Cleary JD; Alexander B Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1988; 22(7-8):601-2. PubMed ID: 3416750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing? Fernandez-Llimos F; Pharm Pract (Granada); 2021; 19(1):2284. PubMed ID: 33520041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process. Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]