These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32161628)

  • 1. How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?
    Fernandez-Llimos F; Salgado TM; Tonin FS;
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2020; 18(1):1804. PubMed ID: 32161628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manuscript Submission Invitations from 'Predatory Journals': What Should Authors Do?
    Kebede M; Schmaus-Klughammer AE; Tekle BT
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 May; 32(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 28378541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
    Tarkang EE; Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.
    Fernandez-Llimos F;
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2018; 16(1):1236. PubMed ID: 29619142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.
    Shamseer L; Moher D; Maduekwe O; Turner L; Barbour V; Burch R; Clark J; Galipeau J; Roberts J; Shea BJ
    BMC Med; 2017 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 28298236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
    Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
    J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.
    Beall J
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Feb; 98(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 26829665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
    Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication.
    Masten Y; Ashcraft A
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Nov; 364(21):. PubMed ID: 29040536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blind versus nonblind review: survey of selected medical journals.
    Cleary JD; Alexander B
    Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1988; 22(7-8):601-2. PubMed ID: 3416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals.
    Oermann MH; Conklin JL; Nicoll LH; Chinn PL; Ashton KS; Edie AH; Amarasekara S; Budinger SC
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2016 Nov; 48(6):624-632. PubMed ID: 27706886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shared burden is always lighter - Peer-review performance in an ophthalmological journal 2010-2020.
    Bro T; Hammarfelt B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 100(5):559-563. PubMed ID: 34608758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. You are invited to submit….
    Moher D; Srivastava A
    BMC Med; 2015 Aug; 13():180. PubMed ID: 26239633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.
    Ferris LE; Winker MA
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 28694719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Predatory journals in otorhinolaryngology].
    Lüers JC; Jansen S; Klußmann JP
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2023 Feb; 102(2):111-117. PubMed ID: 36436507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?
    Fernandez-Llimos F;
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2021; 19(1):2284. PubMed ID: 33520041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
    Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.