These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3216182)
1. Survey of computer-assisted electrocardiography in the United States. Drazen E; Mann N; Borun R; Laks M; Bersen A J Electrocardiol; 1988; 21 Suppl():S98-104. PubMed ID: 3216182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Status of computerized electrocardiography. Hongo RH; Goldschlager N Cardiol Clin; 2006 Aug; 24(3):491-504, x. PubMed ID: 16939838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Computerized ECG: Friend and Foe. Smulyan H Am J Med; 2019 Feb; 132(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 30205084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential benefits of a computer ECG interpretation system for primary care physicians in a community hospital. Grauer K; Kravitz L; Ariet M; Curry RW; Nelson WP; Marriott HJ J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 2646852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eyewitness to history: Landmarks in the development of computerized electrocardiography. Rautaharju PM J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26620728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service. Woolley D; Henck M; Luck J J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of computer-assisted electrocardiographic interpretation on physicians' diagnostic decisions. Hillson SD; Connelly DP; Liu Y Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7783570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Support of daily ECG procedures in a cardiology department via the integration of an existing clinical database and a commercial ECG management system. Chiarugi F; Lombardi D; Lees PJ; Chronaki CE; Tsiknakis M; Orphanoudakis SC Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2002 Jul; 7(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 12167189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between EASI system 12-lead ECGs and standard 12-lead ECGs for improved clinical nursing practice. Lancia L; Pisegna Cerone M; Vittorini P; Romano S; Penco M J Clin Nurs; 2008 Feb; 17(3):370-7. PubMed ID: 18205693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New trends in computer ECG analysis. van Bemmel JH J Electrocardiol; 1996; 29 Suppl():1-4. PubMed ID: 9238369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interoperable Integration of Automatic ECG Processing Using DICOMweb and the AcuWave Software Suite. Graf L; Krefting D; Kesztyüs T; Oremek M; Zenker S; Spicher N Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Aug; 316():1401-1405. PubMed ID: 39176642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Flexible 12-Lead/Holter Device with Compression Capabilities for Low-Bandwidth Mobile-ECG Telemedicine Applications. Pineda-López F; Martínez-Fernández A; Rojo-Álvarez JL; García-Alberola A; Blanco-Velasco M Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30400587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party. Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW; Zywietz C Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 2233372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Signal-averaging ECGs: an update. Health Devices; 1990 Sep; 19(9):328-30. PubMed ID: 2211175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experiences in digitizing and digitally measuring a paper-based ECG archive. Holkeri A; Eranti A; Kenttä TV; Noponen K; Haukilahti MAE; Seppänen T; Junttila MJ; Kerola T; Rissanen H; Heliövaara M; Knekt P; Aro AL; Huikuri HV J Electrocardiol; 2018; 51(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 29031413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of computer-assisted test interpretation on physician decision making: the case of electrocardiograms. Brailer DJ; Kroch E; Pauly MV Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 8994154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation. Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the high-frequency cutoff of bandpass filtering on ECG quality and clinical interpretation: A comparison between 40Hz and 150Hz cutoff in a surgical preoperative adult outpatient population. Ricciardi D; Cavallari I; Creta A; Di Giovanni G; Calabrese V; Di Belardino N; Mega S; Colaiori I; Ragni L; Proscia C; Nenna A; Di Sciascio G J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 27498055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]