These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32162967)

  • 1. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
    Lee H; Jeong SK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of presentation duration on filtering of irrelevant stimuli in visual working memory.
    Liu Q; Yin X; Guo L; Ye C
    BMC Psychol; 2024 Sep; 12(1):469. PubMed ID: 39223690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
    Bahle B; Thayer DD; Mordkoff JT; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):967-983. PubMed ID: 31589068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
    Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
    Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The locus of visual search's interference on visual working memory.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Sep; 48(9):987-1000. PubMed ID: 35925748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forget Me if You Can: Attentional capture by to-Be-remembered and to-Be-forgotten visual stimuli.
    Sasin E; Morey CC; Nieuwenstein M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1643-1650. PubMed ID: 28074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials Reveal Dynamic (Re)allocation of Spatial Attention during Maintenance and Utilization of Visual Working Memory.
    Chota S; Bruat AT; Van der Stigchel S; Strauch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; 36(5):800-814. PubMed ID: 38261370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention mediates the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources.
    Emrich SM; Lockhart HA; Al-Aidroos N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1454-1465. PubMed ID: 28368161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
    Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.
    Tas AC; Luck SJ; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1121-1138. PubMed ID: 26854532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.