217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32163472)
1. Human observer performance on in-plane digital breast tomosynthesis images: Effects of reconstruction filters and data acquisition angles on signal detection.
Lee C; Han M; Baek J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229915. PubMed ID: 32163472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of optical blurring of X-ray source on breast tomosynthesis image quality: Modulation transfer function, anatomical noise power spectrum, and signal detectability perspectives.
Lee C; Baek J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267850. PubMed ID: 35587494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of human observer performance on lesion detectability in single-slice and multislice dedicated breast cone beam CT images with breast anatomical background.
Han M; Jang H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5385-5396. PubMed ID: 30273955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human and model observer performance for lesion detection in breast cone beam CT images with the FDK reconstruction.
Han M; Kim B; Baek J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194408. PubMed ID: 29543868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A performance comparison of anthropomorphic model observers for breast cone beam CT images: A single-slice and multislice study.
Han M; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3431-3441. PubMed ID: 31106432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.
Zeng R; Badano A; Myers KJ
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2598-2611. PubMed ID: 28151728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of anatomical noise on the detectability of cone beam CT images with different slice direction, slice thickness, and volume glandular fraction.
Han M; Park S; Baek J
Opt Express; 2016 Aug; 24(17):18843-59. PubMed ID: 27557168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-plane image quality and NPWE detectability index in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095013. PubMed ID: 32191923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic approach to a channelized Hotelling model observer implementation for a physical phantom containing mass-like lesions: Application to digital breast tomosynthesis.
Petrov D; Marshall NW; Young KC; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2019 Feb; 58():8-20. PubMed ID: 30824154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can a channelized Hotelling observer assess image quality in acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom including image processing?
Balta C; Bouwman RW; Sechopoulos I; Broeders MJM; Karssemeijer N; van Engen RE; Veldkamp WJH
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):714-725. PubMed ID: 30561108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model observer for assessing digital breast tomosynthesis for multi-lesion detection in the presence of anatomical noise.
Wen G; Markey MK; Haygood TM; Park S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045017. PubMed ID: 29376838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space.
Chawla AS; Lo JY; Baker JA; Samei E
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4859-69. PubMed ID: 19994493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detectability comparison of simulated tumors in digital breast tomosynthesis using high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive and commercial imaging systems.
Ghani MU; Wong MD; Omoumi FH; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():34-41. PubMed ID: 29609816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward image quality assessment in mammography using model observers: Detection of a calcification-like object.
Bouwman RW; Mackenzie A; van Engen RE; Broeders MJM; Young KC; Dance DR; den Heeten GJ; Veldkamp WJH
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5726-5739. PubMed ID: 28837225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
