These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32163665)
1. The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomical Models on First-Year Student Engagement in a Block Mode Delivery. Tripodi N; Kelly K; Husaric M; Wospil R; Fleischmann M; Johnston S; Harkin K Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Nov; 13(6):769-777. PubMed ID: 32163665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Smith CF; Tollemache N; Covill D; Johnston M Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 28753247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is This Mine to Keep? Three-dimensional Printing Enables Active, Personalized Learning in Anatomy. Backhouse S; Taylor D; Armitage JA Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Sep; 12(5):518-528. PubMed ID: 30406975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effects of a Functional Three-dimensional (3D) Printed Knee Joint Simulator in Improving Anatomical Spatial Knowledge. Cai B; Rajendran K; Bay BH; Lee J; Yen CC Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):610-618. PubMed ID: 30536570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students. Attardi SM; Barbeau ML; Rogers KA Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Nov; 11(6):592-604. PubMed ID: 29493909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education. Mogali SR; Yeong WY; Tan HKJ; Tan GJS; Abrahams PH; Zary N; Low-Beer N; Ferenczi MA Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 28544582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interactive Lecture in the Dissection Hall: Transforming Passive Lecture into a Dynamic Learning Experience. Chimmalgi M Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30118568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An exploration of the factors that contribute to learning satisfaction of first-year anatomy and physiology students. Eagleton S Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Sep; 39(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 26330031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course. Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel way to engage medical students in learning gross anatomy at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine. DiLullo C Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):665-6. PubMed ID: 17594566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study. Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting. Barmaki R; Yu K; Pearlman R; Shingles R; Bork F; Osgood GM; Navab N Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 30648818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the Dimensions of Medical Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Learning Resources and Assessing the Impact on Assessment Outcomes. Pickering JD; Swinnerton BJ Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):117-128. PubMed ID: 30168911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cadaveric Dissection in Relation to Problem-Based Learning Case Sequencing: A Report of Medical Student Musculoskeletal Examination Performances and Self-Confidence. Thompson KL; Gendreau JL; Strickling JE; Young HE Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):619-626. PubMed ID: 31069967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomy Learning from Prosected Cadaveric Specimens Versus Plastic Models: A Comparative Study of Upper Limb Anatomy. Mitrousias V; Karachalios TS; Varitimidis SE; Natsis K; Arvanitis DL; Zibis AH Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul; 13(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 31251473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy. Morton DA; Colbert-Getz JM Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27427860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the Jigsaw Method to Teach Abdominal Anatomy. Oakes DJ; Hegedus EM; Ollerenshaw SL; Drury H; Ritchie HE Anat Sci Educ; 2019 May; 12(3):272-283. PubMed ID: 30179312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Students' perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. Bergman EM; de Bruin AB; Herrler A; Verheijen IW; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP BMC Med Educ; 2013 Nov; 13():152. PubMed ID: 24252155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of 3D foot and ankle puzzle enhances student understanding of the skeletal anatomy in the early years of medical school. Al-Ani SA; Chandla D; Delieu J; Yu ST; Fratini A; Gkountiou R; Stocker CJ Surg Radiol Anat; 2024 Sep; 46(9):1429-1438. PubMed ID: 39060740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory. Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]