These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32165012)

  • 41. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
    Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.
    Sadig W
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Apr; 40(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 19417876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures.
    Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant-supported overdentures under biting force: An in-vitro study.
    Zhang X; Liu W; Qing H; Pei X; Chen J; Wang J
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 29989109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Investigation of retentive force reduction and wear of the locator attachment system with different implant angulations.
    Rabbani S; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):556-63. PubMed ID: 25671627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In Vitro Effect of Mastication on the Retention and Wear of Locator Attachments in a Flat Mandibular Ridge Model.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Majzoub Z; Nahas P; Berberi A; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e744-e751. PubMed ID: 29968276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of Denture Cleansing Solutions on the Retention of Locator Attachments Over Time.
    Ayyıldız S; Şahin C; Emir F; Ersu B
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Mar; 29(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 31943512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study.
    Setz I; Lee SH; Engel E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 9760365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of Excessive Implant Angulation on Retention of Two Types of Overdenture Attachments during Cyclic Loading.
    Teimoori H; Shayegh SS; Zavaree MA; Hakimaneh SM; Khodadad F; Shidfar S; Baghani MT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1221-1227. PubMed ID: 30498177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retention of implant-supported overdentures at different implant angulations: comparing Locator and ball attachments.
    Sultana N; Bartlett DW; Suleiman M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1406-1410. PubMed ID: 28191678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Locator retention: does variation in number and configuration matter?
    Cayouette MJ; Barnes L; McPherson K; Wright GJ
    Gen Dent; 2017; 65(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 28068264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ibrahim AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):381–389. PubMed ID: 30703183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture.
    Hegazy SA; El Mekawy N; Emera RMK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 32769276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Electromyographic Connectivity of Masseter Muscle with Different Retentive Attachments for Implant Overdentures in Patients with Atrophied Mandibular Ridges: A Crossover Study.
    ElSyad MA; Ibrahim AE; Nawar NHH; Belal TM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1213–1222. PubMed ID: 30892293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.