These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32165958)

  • 1. Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study.
    Bommanagoudar J; Chandrashekhar S; Sharma S; Jain H
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Dec; 7(23):4089-4093. PubMed ID: 32165958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of enamel preparations on fracture resistance of composite resin buildup of fractures involving dentine in anterior bovine teeth: an in vitro study.
    Gandhi K; Nandlal B
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Jun; 24(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 16823230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Class IV preparations for fractured anterior teeth restored with composite resin restorations.
    Eid H; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 12739678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cavity design on the biomechanics of direct composite resin restorations in Class IV preparations.
    Xu H; Jiang Z; Xiao X; Fu J; Su Q
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Apr; 120(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22409223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of composite resin restorations in class IV preparations.
    Eid H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11990047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Load-bearing Capacity of Fractured Incisal Edge of Maxillary Permanent Central Incisors restored with a Glass Fiber-reinforced Nanocomposite: An in vitro Study.
    Kumar PP; Srilatha KT; Nandlal B; Dhull KS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 8(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 26124577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers.
    Schmidt KK; Chiayabutr Y; Phillips KM; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):374-82. PubMed ID: 21640238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of adhesive system and bevel preparation on fracture strength of teeth restored with composite resin.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Rocha Ada C; Rubini A; Klein-Júnior CA; Demarco FF
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 20976383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of chamfer design on load capacity of reattached incisors.
    Zhang L; Ye N; Aregawi WA; Fok A
    Dent Mater; 2021 Jul; 37(7):1168-1175. PubMed ID: 33966913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Margin designs and fracture resistance of incisal resin composite restorations.
    Tan DE; Tjan AH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 1524737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
    Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: a comparison between two techniques.
    Zarone F; Epifania E; Leone G; Sorrentino R; Ferrari M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 May; 95(5):354-63. PubMed ID: 16679130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
    Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of margin design for fiber-reinforced composite crowns to compressive fracture resistance.
    Maghrabi AA; Ayad MF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 21771172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enamel thickness after preparation of tooth for porcelain laminate.
    Pahlevan A; Mirzaee M; Yassine E; Ranjbar Omrany L; Hasani Tabatabaee M; Kermanshah H; Arami S; Abbasi M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Jul; 11(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 25584054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations.
    Castelnuovo J; Tjan AH; Phillips K; Nicholls JI; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 10668029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Galyan G; Padda BK; Kaur TP; Sharma M; Kapur I; Kaur S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 May; 20(5):566-570. PubMed ID: 31316019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.