These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32166443)

  • 1. Patient-specific heart simulation can identify non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Isotani A; Yoneda K; Iwamura T; Watanabe M; Okada JI; Washio T; Sugiura S; Hisada T; Ando K
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1135-1147. PubMed ID: 32166443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.
    Ross S; Odland HH; Aranda A; Edvardsen T; Gammelsrud LO; Haland TF; Cornelussen R; Hopp E; Kongsgaard E
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-scale, tailor-made heart simulation can predict the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Okada JI; Washio T; Nakagawa M; Watanabe M; Kadooka Y; Kariya T; Yamashita H; Yamada Y; Momomura SI; Nagai R; Hisada T; Sugiura S
    J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 108():17-23. PubMed ID: 28502795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical Substrates Driving Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Combined Clinical-Computational Evaluation.
    Huntjens PR; Ploux S; Strik M; Walmsley J; Ritter P; Haissaguerre M; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T; Lumens J; Bordachar P
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e005647. PubMed ID: 29654125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.
    Schiedat F; Schöne D; Aweimer A; Bösche L; Ewers A; Gotzmann M; Patsalis PC; Mügge A; Kloppe A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 109(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 31152199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Improvement Versus Current Guidelines.
    Feeny AK; Rickard J; Patel D; Toro S; Trulock KM; Park CJ; LaBarbera MA; Varma N; Niebauer MJ; Sinha S; Gorodeski EZ; Grimm RA; Ji X; Barnard J; Madabhushi A; Spragg DD; Chung MK
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e007316. PubMed ID: 31216884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. His-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Maximize Electrical Resynchronization: A Feasibility Study.
    Vijayaraman P; Herweg B; Ellenbogen KA; Gajek J
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e006934. PubMed ID: 30681348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.
    Niazi I; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Sheppard R; Worley SJ; Varma N; Lee K; Tomassoni G;
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 3(13):1510-1518. PubMed ID: 29759832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in adults with congenital heart disease.
    Koyak Z; de Groot JR; Krimly A; Mackay TM; Bouma BJ; Silversides CK; Oechslin EN; Hoke U; van Erven L; Budts W; Van Gelder IC; Mulder BJM; Harris L
    Europace; 2018 Feb; 20(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 28108550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of the longest intrapatient left ventricular electrical delay may predict acute hemodynamic improvement in patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Fraccaro C; Roncon L; Aggio S; Noventa F; Mazza A; Prinzen F
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 7(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 24668162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Vereckei A; Szelényi Z; Kutyifa V; Zima E; Szénási G; Kiss M; Katona G; Karádi I; Merkely B
    Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 28011802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25109276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model-based navigation of left and right ventricular leads to optimal targets for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a single-center feasibility study.
    Laksman Z; Yee R; Stirrat J; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Leong-Sit P; Manlucu J; McCarty D; Turkistani Y; Scholl D; Rajchl M; Goela A; Islam A; Thompson RT; Drangova M; White JA
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 7(6):1040-7. PubMed ID: 25221334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute improvement of left ventricular relaxation as a predictor of volume reduction after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a pilot study assessing the value of left ventricular hemodynamic parameter.
    Kato H; Shimano M; Sumi T; Murakami H; Kada K; Inden Y; Tsuboi N; Murohara T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Nov; 37(11):1544-52. PubMed ID: 25113752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of paced left ventricular dyssynchrony on left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Gauthey A; Willemen E; Lumens J; Ploux S; Bordachar P; Ritter P; Prinzen FW; Lejeune S; Pouleur AC; Garnir Q; Marchandise S; Scavée C; Wauters A; le Polain de Waroux JB
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 31908084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An exploratory study on coronary sinus lead tip three-dimensional trajectory changes in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Tomasi C; Corsi C; Turco D; Severi S
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Sep; 10(9):1360-7. PubMed ID: 23851066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Killu AM; Park JY; Sara JD; Hodge DO; Gersh BJ; Nishimura RA; Asirvatham SJ; McLeod CJ
    Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 29315424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study.
    Biffi M; Defaye P; Jaïs P; Ruffa F; Leclercq C; Gras D; Yang Z; Gerritse B; Ziacchi M; Morgan JM;
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 259():88-93. PubMed ID: 29579617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New insights from a computational model on the relation between pacing site and CRT response.
    Pluijmert M; Bovendeerd PH; Lumens J; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T
    Europace; 2016 Dec; 18(suppl 4):iv94-iv103. PubMed ID: 28011836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcome of patients with and without super-response to CRT-D.
    Franke J; Keppler J; Abadei AK; Bajrovic A; Meme L; Zugck C; Raake PW; Zitron E; Katus HA; Frankenstein L
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 105(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 26497005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.