These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32166995)
1. Miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients. Miranda F; Bastos JCDC; Dos Santos AM; Vieira LS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Janson G; Garib D J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 47(2):170-180. PubMed ID: 32166995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentoskeletal comparison of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction with hybrid and conventional hyrax expanders: A randomized clinical trial. Miranda F; Cunha Bastos JCD; Magno Dos Santos A; Janson G; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):774-783. PubMed ID: 34509329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upper airway changes in Class III patients using miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction with hybrid and hyrax expanders: a randomized controlled trial. Miranda F; Garib D; Pugliese F; da Cunha Bastos JC; Janson G; Palomo JM Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):183-195. PubMed ID: 34041608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the skeletodental effects of miniscrew-anchored and tooth-anchored facemask treatment in growing patients with skeletal class III malocclusions. Choi YK; Park JJ; Jeon HH; Kim YI Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 37272219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask. Tarraf NE; Dalci O; Dalci K; Altug AT; Darendeliler MA Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances. Palma JC; Tejedor-Sanz N; Oteo MD; Alarcón JA Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effectiveness and long-term stability of maxillary protraction]. Ren CC; Bai YX Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 53(10):649-652. PubMed ID: 30392219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial. Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D effects of a bone-anchored intra-oral protraction in treating class III growing patient: a pilot study. Almuzian M; Almukhtar A; Ulhaq A; Alharbi F; Darendeliler MA Prog Orthod; 2019 Sep; 20(1):37. PubMed ID: 31531735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance. Altug Z; Arslan AD Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion. Lee SH; Koh SD; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary protraction for early orthopedic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Major PW; elBadrawy HE Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 8378159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angle Class III malocclusion with anteroposterior and vertical discrepancy in the final stage of growth. Arruda MBP Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(3):109-118. PubMed ID: 28746494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentofacial effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction on prepubertal children with maxillary deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Kamel AM; Tarraf NE; Fouda AM; Hafez AM; El-Bialy A; Wilmes B Prog Orthod; 2023 Jun; 24(1):22. PubMed ID: 37303011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study. Williams MD; Sarver DM; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 9573888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients: Seiryu M; Ida H; Mayama A; Sasaki S; Sasaki S; Deguchi T; Takano-Yamamoto T Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31398066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonextraction treatment of a skeletal Class III malocclusion. León-Salazar V; Janson G; de Freitas MR; de Almeida RR; León-Salazar R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):736-45. PubMed ID: 19892292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Cornelis MA; Tepedino M; Riis NV; Niu X; Cattaneo PM Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jan; 43(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 32815989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]