These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32168542)

  • 1. In Vitro Comparison of Modes of Failures among Titanium and One- and Two-piece Zirconia Abutment under Static Load.
    Alqahtani F; AlAmar M
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Feb; 14(1):157-160. PubMed ID: 32168542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connection Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments.
    AlAmar M; Alqahtani F
    J Oral Implantol; 2020 Apr; 46(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 31909678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro performance of two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application.
    Preis V; Kammermeier A; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jun; 32(6):765-74. PubMed ID: 27068740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of zirconia-based implant abutments after artificial long-term aging.
    Alsahhaf A; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Feb; 66():224-232. PubMed ID: 27915156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
    Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
    Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 25976709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical stability of all-ceramic abutments retained with three different screw materials in two-piece zirconia implants-an in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Lang A; Beuer F; Mansour S; Erdelt K; Krennmair G; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1801-1806. PubMed ID: 31478098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
    Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
    Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strength study of internally connected zirconia abutments reinforced with titanium inserts.
    Chun HJ; Yeo IS; Lee JH; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Han JS; Lee SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):346-50. PubMed ID: 25830395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments with Different Diameters.
    Shabanpour R; Mousavi N; Ghodsi S; Alikhasi M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 26423495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postfatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Alqahtani F; Flinton R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 24461943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fatigue and fracture resistance of one- and two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P; Johannson D; Fischer C; Stawarczyk B; Beuer F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):546-54. PubMed ID: 26009905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro fatigue and fracture strength testing of one-piece zirconia implant abutments and zirconia implant abutments connected to titanium cores.
    Stimmelmayr M; Sagerer S; Erdelt K; Beuer F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):488-93. PubMed ID: 23527351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
    Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.