335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32168947)
1. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.
Lee HH; Huang BS; Cheng M; Yeh CC; Lin IC; Horng HC; Huang HY; Lee WL; Wang PH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32168947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol compared to intravaginal misoprostol-only for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yin J; Li Y; Chen Y; Wang C; Song X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():76-84. PubMed ID: 36566685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.
Chen W; Xue J; Gaudet L; Walker M; Wen SW
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 129(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 25794821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.
Nasioudis D; Kim SW; Schoen C; Levine LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 33345815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Afolabi BB; Oyeneyin OL; Ogedengbe OK
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 89(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 15919393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
Ande AB; Ezeanochie CM; Olagbuji NB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.
Tabowei TO; Oboro VO
East Afr Med J; 2003 Feb; 80(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16167722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Garg R; Bagga R; Kumari A; Kalra J; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 34027782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
