These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32169043)

  • 1. Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 34404344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?
    Piper SK; Grittner U; Rex A; Riedel N; Fischer F; Nadon R; Siegerink B; Dirnagl U
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000188. PubMed ID: 30964856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternatives.
    Bacchetti P
    BMC Med; 2010 Mar; 8():17. PubMed ID: 20307281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistics in clinical research: Important considerations.
    Barkan H
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2015; 18(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 25566715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size planning for rank-based multiple contrast tests.
    Pöhlmann A; Brunner E; Konietschke F
    Biom J; 2024 Apr; 66(3):e2300240. PubMed ID: 38637304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on statistical repeatability and study design for high-throughput assays.
    Nicholson G; Holmes C
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):790-798. PubMed ID: 27882571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On tests of treatment-covariate interactions: An illustration of appropriate power and sample size calculations.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177682. PubMed ID: 28545117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Six persistent research misconceptions.
    Rothman KJ
    J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1060-4. PubMed ID: 24452418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining reference ranges and sample sizes in parallel-group studies.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278447. PubMed ID: 36449490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insulin resistance, C-reactive protein, diastolic to systolic blood pressure ratio and epicardial fat are related to sedentary time, and inversely related to physical activity in school-aged children.
    Vasileva F; Carreras-Badosa G; Bassols J; Serrano-Ferrer J; Font-Lladó R; López-Ros V; Osiniri I; Martínez-Calcerrada JM; San Millán M; López-Bermejo A; Prats-Puig A
    Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1339860. PubMed ID: 38577274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing individual equivalence in parallel group and crossover designs: Exact test and sample size procedures.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0269128. PubMed ID: 35622872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162093. PubMed ID: 27598468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precise confidence intervals of regression-based reference limits: Method comparisons and sample size requirements.
    Shieh G
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Dec; 91():191-197. PubMed ID: 29100113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matched-pair noninferiority trials using rate ratio: a comparison of current methods and sample size refinement.
    Tang ML
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Aug; 24(4):364-77. PubMed ID: 12865032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of alternative approaches for difference, noninferiority, and equivalence testing of normal percentiles.
    Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 32169043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The appropriateness of Bland-Altman's approximate confidence intervals for limits of agreement.
    Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 29788915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.