194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32169128)
1. Doppler Ultrasound Evaluation of the Efficacy of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Treatment of Cesarean Section Scar Pregnancy.
Huo X; Xie Y; Yang L; Deng K; Liu Y
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2020 Mar; 30(3):240-244. PubMed ID: 32169128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Liu CN; Tang L; Sun Y; Liu YH; Yu HJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 59(3):387-391. PubMed ID: 32416885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparison of different HIFU sonication strategies.
Yin Y; Pan F; He M; Zhang C; Liu Y
Int J Hyperthermia; 2022; 39(1):390-396. PubMed ID: 35196957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.
Hong Y; Guo Q; Pu Y; Lu D; Hu M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7687. PubMed ID: 28746234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with dilatation and curettage for Cesarean scar pregnancy.
Huang L; Du Y; Zhao C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 23836523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management.
Seow KM; Huang LW; Lin YH; Lin MY; Tsai YL; Hwang JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 23(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 15027012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Xiao J; Zhang S; Wang F; Wang Y; Shi Z; Zhou X; Zhou J; Huang J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):356.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24769010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Treatment with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization.
Xiao J; Shi Z; Zhou J; Ye J; Zhu J; Zhou X; Wang F; Zhang S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):640-647. PubMed ID: 27979666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in patients following treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage.
Zhang C; Zhang Y; He J; Zhang L
Int J Hyperthermia; 2019; 36(1):926-931. PubMed ID: 31466485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhu X; Deng X; Wan Y; Xiao S; Huang J; Zhang L; Xue M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 May; 94(18):e854. PubMed ID: 25950698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.
Xiao X; Feng Z; Li T; Yi B; Zhang S; Wang W
Adv Ther; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1314-1325. PubMed ID: 31049875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II.
Liu Y; Yin Q; Xu F; Luo S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jul; 22(1):607. PubMed ID: 35907811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.
Liu Y; Wang L; Zhu X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):446-454. PubMed ID: 36893898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Chen L; Xiao S; Zhu X; He S; Xue M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):883-890. PubMed ID: 30205163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.
Liu S; Sun J; Cai B; Xi X; Yang L; Sun Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):707-11. PubMed ID: 26803916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment.
Peng Y; Dai Y; Yu G; Jin P
Int J Hyperthermia; 2022; 39(1):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 36414236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhu X; Deng X; Xiao S; Wan Y; Xue M
Int J Hyperthermia; 2016; 32(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 26644262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical efficacy and safety between high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Mi W; Pei P; Zheng Y
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jun; 10(6):6379-6387. PubMed ID: 34237960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-intensity focused ultrasound compared with uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Wang W; Chen Y; Yang Y; Qu D; Jiang J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 158(3):572-578. PubMed ID: 34797925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Novel Treatment for Cervical and Cesarean Section Scar Pregnancies by Transvaginal Injection of Absolute Ethanol to Trophoblasts: Efficacy in 19 Cases.
Osada H; Teramoto S; Kaijima H; Segawa T; Miyauchi O; Nagaishi M; Shozu M; Kato K; Gomel V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29723645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
