These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32169306)
21. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review. Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A semi-supervised learning approach for automated 3D cephalometric landmark identification using computed tomography. Yun HS; Hyun CM; Baek SH; Lee SH; Seo JK PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275114. PubMed ID: 36170279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fully automated landmarking and facial segmentation on 3D photographs. Berends B; Bielevelt F; Schreurs R; Vinayahalingam S; Maal T; de Jong G Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6463. PubMed ID: 38499700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms. Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nose approximation among South African groups from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using a new computer-assisted method based on automatic landmarking. Ridel AF; Demeter F; L'abbé EN; Vandermeulen D; Oettlé AC Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110357. PubMed ID: 32603884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images. Kim MJ; Liu Y; Oh SH; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33445758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images. Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study. Bermejo E; Taniguchi K; Ogawa Y; Martos R; Valsecchi A; Mesejo P; Ibáñez O; Imaizumi K Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Oct; 210():106380. PubMed ID: 34478914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study. Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review. Pittayapat P; Limchaichana-Bolstad N; Willems G; Jacobs R Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 May; 17(2):69-91. PubMed ID: 24373559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks by a designed software. Shahidi Sh; Oshagh M; Gozin F; Salehi P; Danaei SM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):20110187. PubMed ID: 23236215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography. Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel approach to craniofacial analysis using automated 3D landmarking of the skull. Wilke F; Matthews H; Herrick N; Dopkins N; Claes P; Walsh S Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12381. PubMed ID: 38811771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images. Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automatic 3D cephalometric annotation system using shadowed 2D image-based machine learning. Lee SM; Kim HP; Jeon K; Lee SH; Seo JK Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(5):055002. PubMed ID: 30669128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence. Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fully Automatic Landmarking of Syndromic 3D Facial Surface Scans Using 2D Images. Bannister JJ; Crites SR; Aponte JD; Katz DC; Wilms M; Klein OD; Bernier FPJ; Spritz RA; Hallgrímsson B; Forkert ND Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32503190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita G; Vieira WA; Vidigal MTC; Travençolo BAN; Beaini TL; Spin-Neto R; Paranhos LR; de Brito Júnior RB J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):1158-1179. PubMed ID: 36604364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Experimental and clinical assessment of three-dimensional cephalometry: a systematic review. Smektała T; Jędrzejewski M; Szyndel J; Sporniak-Tutak K; Olszewski R J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 25037877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cephalometric landmark identification consistency between undergraduate dental students and orthodontic residents in 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomography images: A preliminary study. Míguez-Contreras M; Jiménez-Trujillo I; Romero-Maroto M; López-de-Andrés A; Lagravère MO Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28024771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]