152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32169312)
1. Neonatal chest radiography: Influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom.
Al-Murshedi S; Peter Hogg ; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):282-287. PubMed ID: 32169312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between body habitus and image quality and radiation dose in chest X-ray examinations: A phantom study.
Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; England A
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():65-71. PubMed ID: 30738533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of radiation dose and low contrast detail detectability using routine paediatric chest radiography protocols.
Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; Meijer A; Erenstein H; England A
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():198-203. PubMed ID: 30927947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between the visual evaluation of pathology visibility and the physical measure of low contrast detail detectability in neonatal chest radiography.
Al-Murshedi S; Benhalim M; Alzyoud K; Papathanasiou S; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Nov; 28(4):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 36099681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality, between and within different x-ray units in a series of hospitals.
Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; Lanca L; England A
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1344-1358. PubMed ID: 30251707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey of chest radiography systems: Any link between contrast detail measurements and visual grading analysis?
Rodríguez Pérez S; Marshall NW; Binst J; Coolen J; Struelens L; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():62-71. PubMed ID: 32599376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimisation of radiation dose and image quality in mobile neonatal chest radiography.
Hinojos-Armendáriz VI; Mejía-Rosales SJ; Franco-Cabrera MC
Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 29605105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose measurements for optimisation of chest X-ray examinations of children in general radiography hospitals.
Suliman II; Elawed SO
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 23542763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cu filtration for dose reduction in neonatal chest imaging.
Smans K; Struelens L; Smet M; Bosmans H; Vanhavere F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):281-6. PubMed ID: 20179072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multi institutional comparison of imaging dose and technique protocols for neonatal chest radiography.
Gunn C; O'Brien K; Fosså K; Tonkopi E; Lanca L; Martins CT; Muller H; Friedrich-Nel H; Abdolell M; Johansen S
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e66-e72. PubMed ID: 32052771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modification of chest radiography exposure parameters using a neonatal chest phantom.
Schäfer SB; Papst S; Fiebich M; Rudolph C; de Laffolie J; Krombach GA
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Jan; 50(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 31583441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organ doses in preterm and full-term neonates and infants - a retrospective study on 1,064 chest radiographs.
Kammer B; Schneider KO; Dell'Agnolo E; Seidenbusch MC
Pediatr Radiol; 2022 Jul; 52(8):1437-1445. PubMed ID: 35303134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobile chest imaging of neonates in incubators: Optimising DR and CR acquisitions.
Tugwell-Allsup J; Kenworthy D; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 32636056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality using a mini mobile digital imaging system in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Kim TH; Ryu JH; Jeong CW; Jun HY; Heo DW; Lee SH; Oh YK; Lee MJ; Yoon KH
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():165-171. PubMed ID: 28064140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimising image quality and radiation dose for neonatal incubator imaging.
Tugwell-Allsup J; Morris RW; Hibbs R; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e258-e263. PubMed ID: 32279922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of acquisition parameters for reduced-dose thoracic CT: A phantom study.
Martini K; Moon JW; Revel MP; Dangeard S; Ruan C; Chassagnon G
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 May; 101(5):269-279. PubMed ID: 32107196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modifications to mobile chest radiography technique during the COVID-19 pandemic - implications of X-raying through side room windows.
England A; Littler E; Romani S; Cosson P
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):193-199. PubMed ID: 32855021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
