These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32169312)

  • 41. An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.
    Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180317. PubMed ID: 29906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of body part thickness on AP pelvis radiographic image quality and effective dose.
    Alzyoud K; Hogg P; Snaith B; Flintham K; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Feb; 25(1):e11-e17. PubMed ID: 30599841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effective dose and image quality for different patient sizes during AP upper abdominal radiography: A phantom study.
    Alzyoud K; Al-Murshedi S; England A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Dec; 202():111060. PubMed ID: 37806283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
    Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluating the effect of reduced entrance surface dose on neonatal chest imaging using subjective image quality evaluation.
    Conradie A; Herbst CP
    Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1368-1374. PubMed ID: 27542577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. PATIENT DOSE ASSESSMENT AND OPTIMISATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Abbeyquaye D; Inkoom S; Hammond NB; Fletcher JJ; Botwe BO
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Aug; 195(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 34320643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. National survey of radiation doses of pediatric chest radiography in Korea: analysis of the factors affecting radiation doses.
    Kim BH; Do KH; Goo HW; Yang DH; Oh SY; Kim HJ; Lee KY; Lee JE
    Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 22977329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Introduction of a New Parameter for Evaluation of Digital Radiography System Performance.
    Choopani MR; Chaparian A
    J Med Signals Sens; 2020; 10(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 33062611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiation dose of non-enhanced chest CT can be reduced 40% by using iterative reconstruction in image space.
    Hu XH; Ding XF; Wu RZ; Zhang MM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1023-9. PubMed ID: 21861995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of radiation dose reduction on clinical image quality in chest radiography of premature neonates using a dual-side readout technique computed radiography system.
    Carlander A; Hansson J; Söderberg J; Steneryd K; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):275-80. PubMed ID: 20200106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Development of Quality-Controlled Low-Dose Protocols for Radiography in the Neonatal ICU Using a New Mobile Digital Radiography System.
    Choi G; Cheon JE; Lee S; Choi YH; Shin SH; Cho YJ; Park SW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Aug; 215(2):488-493. PubMed ID: 32406770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE.
    Mourik JE; van der Tol P; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):303-7. PubMed ID: 26535003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY UTILISING BMI CLASSIFICATION.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 30452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dose optimisation in paediatric radiography - Using regression models to investigate the relative impact of acquisition factors on image quality and radiation dose.
    Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; England A
    Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():61-68. PubMed ID: 31751806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of body part thickness on low-contrast detail detection and radiation dose during adult chest radiography.
    Al-Murshedi S; Alzyoud K; Benhalim M; Alresheedi N; Papathanasiou S; England A
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Mar; 71(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 38050453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
    Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Comparison of chest and abdominal x-ray radiation dose and its image quality-a multi-center study].
    Uto T; Ishiyama A; Kimura H; Katuragi Y; Masunari T; Shibutani T; Ishiki K; Nakanishi K; Anai T; Sumida S; Morimatu T; Miyano H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 21467733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of dose reduction potential in scatter-corrected bedside chest radiography using U-net.
    Onodera S; Lee Y; Tanaka Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 32986183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.