123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32170259)
1. Blended learning as an adjunct to tutor-led seminars in undergraduate orthodontics: a randomised controlled trial.
Jeganathan S; Fleming PS
Br Dent J; 2020 Mar; 228(5):371-375. PubMed ID: 32170259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A survey of undergraduate orthodontic teaching and factors affecting pursuit of postgraduate training.
Jauhar P; Mossey PA; Popat H; Seehra J; Fleming PS
Br Dent J; 2016 Oct; 221(8):487-492. PubMed ID: 27767152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An assessment of student experiences and learning based on a novel undergraduate e-learning resource.
Mehta S; Clarke F; Fleming PS
Br Dent J; 2016 Aug; 221(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 27514348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Blended Learning System to Improve Motivation, Mood State, and Satisfaction in Undergraduate Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Lozano-Lozano M; Fernández-Lao C; Cantarero-Villanueva I; Noguerol I; Álvarez-Salvago F; Cruz-Fernández M; Arroyo-Morales M; Galiano-Castillo N
J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e17101. PubMed ID: 32441655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Seifert LB; Socolan O; Sader R; Rüsseler M; Sterz J
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 19(1):454. PubMed ID: 31801531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learner-control vs. program-control instructional multimedia: a comparison of two interactions when teaching principles of orthodontic appliances.
Aly M; Elen J; Willems G
Eur J Dent Educ; 2005 Nov; 9(4):157-63. PubMed ID: 16194247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of face-to-face, blended and e-learning in teaching the application of local anaesthesia: a randomised study.
Bock A; Kniha K; Goloborodko E; Lemos M; Rittich AB; Möhlhenrich SC; Rafai N; Hölzle F; Modabber A
BMC Med Educ; 2021 Feb; 21(1):137. PubMed ID: 33639906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of two e-learning methods teaching undergraduate students cephalometry in orthodontics.
Ludwig B; Bister D; Schott TC; Lisson JA; Hourfar J
Eur J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 20(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 25560366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interactive distance learning for orthodontic residents: utilization and acceptability.
Klein KP; Hannum WM; Koroluk LD; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):378-385. PubMed ID: 22381499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomised controlled trial.
McCutcheon K; O'Halloran P; Lohan M
Int J Nurs Stud; 2018 Jun; 82():30-39. PubMed ID: 29574394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Student experiences of two small group learning-teaching formats: Seminar and fishbowl.
Tricio J; Montt J; Orsini C; Gracia B; Pampin F; Quinteros C; Salas M; Soto R; Fuentes N
Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 May; 23(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 30584690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Students' attitudes towards an on-line orthodontic learning resource.
Linjawi AL; Hamdan AM; Perryer DG; Walmsley AD; Hill KB
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 May; 13(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19368551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing case-based and lecture-based learning strategies for orthodontic case diagnosis: A randomized controlled trial.
Alhazmi A; Quadri MFA
J Dent Educ; 2020 Aug; 84(8):857-863. PubMed ID: 32374442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of an audience response system on orthodontic knowledge retention of undergraduate dental students--a randomised control trial.
Robson N; Popat H; Richmond S; Farnell DJ
J Orthod; 2015; 42(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 26282015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of a Web-Based Patient Simulation Program to Teach Dental Students in Oral Surgery.
Weiner CK; Skålén M; Harju-Jeanty D; Heymann R; Rosén A; Fors U; Lund B
J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 26834130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A learner-control instructional multimedia program is as effective as a program-control version in undergraduate orthodontic teaching.
Bearn D
Evid Based Dent; 2007; 8(1):18. PubMed ID: 17380178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates.
Bains M; Reynolds PA; McDonald F; Sherriff M
Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 May; 15(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 21492347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dental students' experiences of treating orthodontic emergencies - a qualitative assessment of student reflections.
Jones K; Popat H; Johnson IG
Eur J Dent Educ; 2016 Aug; 20(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 27404001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
