163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32170695)
1. Isolation of Swine Influenza A Virus in Cell Cultures and Embryonated Chicken Eggs.
Zhang J; Gauger PC
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2123():281-294. PubMed ID: 32170695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Isolation of swine influenza virus in cell cultures and embryonated chicken eggs.
Zhang J; Gauger PC
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1161():265-76. PubMed ID: 24899436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Avian Influenza Virus Isolation, Propagation, and Titration in Embryonated Chicken Eggs.
Spackman E; Killian ML
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2123():149-164. PubMed ID: 32170687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avian influenza virus isolation, propagation, and titration in embryonated chicken eggs.
Spackman E; Killian ML
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1161():125-40. PubMed ID: 24899426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Susceptibility of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Derived Cell Lines for Isolation of Swine Origin Influenza A Viruses from Different Clinical Specimens.
Suderman M; Moniwa M; Alkie TN; Ojkic D; Broes A; Pople N; Berhane Y
Viruses; 2021 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 34960614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of embryonated chicken eggs with MDCK cell culture for the isolation of swine influenza virus.
Clavijo A; Tresnan DB; Jolie R; Zhou EM
Can J Vet Res; 2002 Apr; 66(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11989733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equine Influenza Culture Methods.
Chambers TM; Reedy SE
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2123():393-400. PubMed ID: 32170705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Susceptibility of different cell lines to Avian and Swine Influenza viruses.
Lombardo T; Dotti S; Renzi S; Ferrari M
J Virol Methods; 2012 Oct; 185(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 22728276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the usefulness of the CACO-2 cell line with standard substrates for isolation of swine influenza A viruses.
Chiapponi C; Zanni I; Garbarino C; Barigazzi G; Foni E
J Virol Methods; 2010 Jan; 163(1):162-5. PubMed ID: 19781571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary Swine Respiratory Epithelial Cell Lines for the Efficient Isolation and Propagation of Influenza A Viruses.
Meliopoulos V; Cherry S; Wohlgemuth N; Honce R; Barnard K; Gauger P; Davis T; Shult P; Parrish C; Schultz-Cherry S
J Virol; 2020 Nov; 94(24):. PubMed ID: 32967961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Madin-Darby canine kidney cell sialic acid receptor modulation induced by culture medium conditions: Implications for the isolation of influenza A virus.
Nelson SW; Lorbach JN; Nolting JM; Stull JW; Jackwood DJ; Davis IC; Bowman AS
Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2019 Nov; 13(6):593-602. PubMed ID: 31392833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness of isolation techniques for contemporary Influenza A virus strains circulating in exhibition swine.
Bowman AS; Nelson SW; Edwards JL; Hofer CC; Nolting JM; Davis IC; Slemons RD
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2013 Jan; 25(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 23242667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of immunogenicity of cell-and egg-passaged viruses for manufacturing MDCK cell culture-based influenza vaccines.
Shin D; Park KJ; Lee H; Cho EY; Kim MS; Hwang MH; Kim SI; Ahn DH
Virus Res; 2015 Jun; 204():40-6. PubMed ID: 25892718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population genomic transformations induced by isolation of wild bird avian influenza viruses (Orthomyxoviridae) in embryonated chicken eggs.
Hopken MW; Piaggio AJ; Pabilonia KL; Pierce J; Anderson T; Pierce C; Abdo Z
Infect Genet Evol; 2021 Jun; 90():104505. PubMed ID: 32827730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of large-scale mammalian cell culture systems with egg culture for the production of influenza virus A vaccine strains.
Tree JA; Richardson C; Fooks AR; Clegg JC; Looby D
Vaccine; 2001 May; 19(25-26):3444-50. PubMed ID: 11348709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alterations in receptor-binding properties of swine influenza viruses of the H1 subtype after isolation in embryonated chicken eggs.
Takemae N; Ruttanapumma R; Parchariyanon S; Yoneyama S; Hayashi T; Hiramatsu H; Sriwilaijaroen N; Uchida Y; Kondo S; Yagi H; Kato K; Suzuki Y; Saito T
J Gen Virol; 2010 Apr; 91(Pt 4):938-48. PubMed ID: 20007353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK) with a green monkey continuous cell line (Vero) and human lung embryonated cells (MRC-5) in the isolation of influenza A virus from nasopharyngeal aspirates by shell vial culture.
Reina J; Fernandez-Baca V; Blanco I; Munar M
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 35(7):1900-1. PubMed ID: 9196221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement of influenza A/Fujian/411/02 (H3N2) virus growth in embryonated chicken eggs by balancing the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase activities, using reverse genetics.
Lu B; Zhou H; Ye D; Kemble G; Jin H
J Virol; 2005 Jun; 79(11):6763-71. PubMed ID: 15890915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection of receptor-binding variants of human influenza A and B viruses in baby hamster kidney cells.
Govorkova EA; Matrosovich MN; Tuzikov AB; Bovin NV; Gerdil C; Fanget B; Webster RG
Virology; 1999 Sep; 262(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10489338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of immune responses to inactivated influenza vaccines prepared in embryonated chicken eggs and MDCK cells in a mouse model.
Nerome K; Kumihashi H; Nerome R; Hiromoto Y; Yokota Y; Ueda R; Omoe K; Chiba M
Dev Biol Stand; 1999; 98():53-63; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 10494959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
