These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32170735)

  • 1. Invited commentary-WHO Classification of Tumours: How should tumors be classified? Expert consensus, systematic reviews or both?
    Uttley L; Indave BI; Hyde C; White V; Lokuhetty D; Cree I
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Jun; 146(12):3516-3521. PubMed ID: 32170735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new series of Invited Reviews on WHO tumor classification.
    Plass C
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Jun; 146(12):3243. PubMed ID: 32187660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Standards, Options and Recommendations: a multidisciplinary program to promote evidence-based oncology].
    Fervers B; Bey P; Maigne D; Philip T
    Bull Cancer; 2001 Jun; 88(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 11459707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delivering consensus from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009.
    Collingridge D
    Lancet Oncol; 2009 Nov; 10(11):1029-30. PubMed ID: 19880059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncology treatment recommendations can be supported only by 1-2% of high-quality published evidence.
    Vincent S; Djulbegovic B
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2005 Jun; 31(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 16006047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ESMO clinical recommendations: a practical guide for medical oncologists.
    Pavlidis N; Hansen H; Stahel R
    Ann Oncol; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1759-63. PubMed ID: 17921244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidance on the creation of evidence-linked guidelines for COIN.
    Rosalki JR; Karp SJ
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1999; 11(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 10194583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. COVID-19 and cancer: do we really know what we think we know?
    Robinson AG; Gyawali B; Evans G
    Nat Rev Clin Oncol; 2020 Jul; 17(7):386-388. PubMed ID: 32424196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): new guidelines.
    Tsuchida Y; Therasse P
    Med Pediatr Oncol; 2001 Jul; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11466715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: formal systematic review-based consensus methodology.
    Loblaw DA; Prestrud AA; Somerfield MR; Oliver TK; Brouwers MC; Nam RK; Lyman GH; Basch E;
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(25):3136-40. PubMed ID: 22778311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study Protocol for the DETECTIVE Study: An International Collaborative Study To Develop Consensus Statements for Deferred Treatment with Curative Intent for Localised Prostate Cancer.
    Lam TBL; MacLennan S; Plass K; Willemse PM; Mason MD; Cornford P; Donaldson J; Davis NF; Dell'Oglio P; Fankhauser C; Grivas N; Ingels A; Lardas M; Liew M; Pang KH; Paterson C; Omar MI; Zattoni F; Buddingh KT; Van den Broeck T; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Moris L; Schoots IG; van den Bergh RCN; Briers E; Fanti S; De Santis M; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; van der Poel HG; van der Kwast TH; Rouvière O; Tilki D; Wiegel T; N'Dow J; Van Poppel H; Mottet N
    Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):699-702. PubMed ID: 30473433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Foreward].
    Ehninger G; Overkamp F; Freund M;
    Onkologie; 2013; 36 Suppl 2():1. PubMed ID: 23549029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discordant and inappropriate discordant recommendations in consensus and evidence based guidelines: empirical analysis.
    Yao L; Ahmed MM; Guyatt GH; Yan P; Hui X; Wang Q; Yang K; Tian J; Djulbegovic B
    BMJ; 2021 Nov; 375():e066045. PubMed ID: 34824101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are ushering in a new stage of standardized management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan.
    Song P; Tang W; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N
    Drug Discov Ther; 2014 Apr; 8(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 24815580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serving the clinician and the patient: three ways that quality clinical guidelines can build on expert consensus statements and systematic reviews.
    Ardern CL
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 Apr; 51(7):557-558. PubMed ID: 27566194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The era of meta-analyses-based recommendations: how were the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer established?
    Takano T
    Breast Cancer; 2020 May; 27(3):332-333. PubMed ID: 32342405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Category of evidence and consensus underlying National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines: Is there evidence of progress?
    Desai AP; Go RS; Poonacha TK
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32674225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Der ältere Krebspatient - Herausforderungen im Krankenhaus und in der Praxis.
    Bokemeyer C; Busse R; Engel J; Gebauer A; Hallek M; Heinemann V; Lüftner D; Wörmann B
    Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41 Suppl 3():2-26. PubMed ID: 30056452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. World Health Ozganization 2017 Classification of Pituitary Tumors.
    Lopes MBS
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 2020 Sep; 49(3):375-386. PubMed ID: 32741477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unanswered questions in the management of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: an overview from the medical oncologist's perspective.
    Shah MA
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2013; ():. PubMed ID: 23714486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.