160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32170939)
1. Assessing the accuracy of predictive models with interval-censored data.
Wu Y; Cook RJ
Biostatistics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 32170939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of predictive model performance of an existing model in the presence of missing data.
Li P; Taylor JMG; Spratt DE; Karnes RJ; Schipper MJ
Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(15):3477-3498. PubMed ID: 33843085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for time to event with semicompeting risks and interval censoring.
Jacqmin-Gadda H; Blanche P; Chary E; Touraine C; Dartigues JF
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2750-2766. PubMed ID: 24803510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variable selection and prediction in biased samples with censored outcomes.
Wu Y; Cook RJ
Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Jan; 24(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 28215038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing data approaches for probability regression models with missing outcomes with applications.
Qi L; Sun Y
J Stat Distrib Appl; 2014; 1():. PubMed ID: 26900543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation in optimal treatment regimes based on mean residual lifetimes with right-censored data.
Liu Z; Zhan Z; Lin C; Zhang B
Biom J; 2023 Dec; 65(8):e2200340. PubMed ID: 37789592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time-dependent ROC curve estimation for interval-censored data.
Beyene KM; El Ghouch A
Biom J; 2022 Aug; 64(6):1056-1074. PubMed ID: 35523738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting and the Double Robustness Property.
Kurz CF
Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):156-167. PubMed ID: 34225519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve estimator for correlated right-censored time-to-event data.
Beyene KM; Chen DG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Jan; 33(1):162-181. PubMed ID: 38130110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic accuracy for predicting ordinal competing risk outcomes using ROC surfaces.
Zhang S; Qu Y; Cheng Y; Lopez OL; Wahed AS
Lifetime Data Anal; 2022 Jan; 28(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 34807357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive accuracy of markers or risk scores for interval censored survival data.
Wu Y; Wang X; Lin J; Jia B; Owzar K
Stat Med; 2020 Aug; 39(18):2437-2446. PubMed ID: 32293745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inverse probability weighted estimators of vaccine effects accommodating partial interference and censoring.
Chakladar S; Rosin S; Hudgens MG; Halloran ME; Clemens JD; Ali M; Emch ME
Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):777-788. PubMed ID: 33768557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating classification performance of biomarkers in two-phase case-control studies.
Wang L; Huang Y
Stat Med; 2019 Jan; 38(1):100-114. PubMed ID: 30209824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction accuracy for the cure probabilities in mixture cure models.
Jiang W; Sun H; Peng Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2029-2041. PubMed ID: 28523948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semiparametric regression on cumulative incidence function with interval-censored competing risks data and missing event types.
Park J; Bakoyannis G; Zhang Y; Yiannoutsos CT
Biostatistics; 2022 Jul; 23(3):738-753. PubMed ID: 33417707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks.
Wolbers M; Blanche P; Koller MT; Witteman JC; Gerds TA
Biostatistics; 2014 Jul; 15(3):526-39. PubMed ID: 24493091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inference for covariate-adjusted time-dependent prognostic accuracy measures.
Dey R; Hanley JA; Saha-Chaudhuri P
Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(23):4082-4110. PubMed ID: 37720987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
Wu Y
Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):3937-3946. PubMed ID: 32725910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple method to estimate the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve with right censored data.
Li L; Greene T; Hu B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2264-2278. PubMed ID: 27895266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
