These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32171703)

  • 1. Image Quality and Performance Benchmarks in Vehicle and Hospital Mammography.
    Chien CY; Loh EW; Lin YK; Huang TW; Wang YH; Wang HW; Tseng YC; Yao MM; Tam KW
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(3):e358-e365. PubMed ID: 32171703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Chiraiya project: a retrospective analysis of breast cancer detection gaps addressed via mobile mammography in Jammu Province, India.
    Gupta G; Jamwal N; Gupta R
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):2087. PubMed ID: 39090665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency and diagnostic outcome of bilateral recall at screening mammography.
    Lameijer JRC; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 32621785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Shih-Pei Wu P; Nolte ELR; Begay JA; Joe AI
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 29951970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of the quality assured double and arbitration reading of mammograms in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in symptomatic women.
    Waldmann A; Kapsimalakou S; Katalinic A; Grande-Nagel I; Stoeckelhuber BM; Fischer D; Barkhausen J; Vogt FM
    Eur Radiol; 2012 May; 22(5):1014-22. PubMed ID: 22095439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contribution and performance of mobile units in an organized mammography screening program.
    Fontenoy AM; Langlois A; Chang SL; Daigle JM; Pelletier É; Guertin MH; Théberge I; Brisson J
    Can J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 104(3):e193-9. PubMed ID: 23823881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Equity in access to breast cancer screening in a mobile mammography program in southern Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil].
    Renck DV; Barros F; Domingues MR; Gonzalez MC; Sclowitz ML; Caputo EL; Gomes Lde M
    Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Jan; 30(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 24627016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mobile mammography screening: the James Graham Brown Cancer Center three year experience. Implications for public and professional education.
    Flynn MB; Amin EA; Martin RC
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Jan; 96(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 9470312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile mammography in underserved populations: analysis of outcomes of 3,923 women.
    Brooks SE; Hembree TM; Shelton BJ; Beache SC; Aschbacher G; Schervish PH; Dignan MB
    J Community Health; 2013 Oct; 38(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 23674194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
    Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of unconventional utilization of BI-RADS category 3 assessment at opportunistic screening.
    Altas H; Tureli D; Cengic I; Kucukkaya F; Aribal E; Kaya H
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 26019241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. screening mammography services with mobile units: results from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 7724778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
    Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
    Poot JD; Chetlen AL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography.
    Honig EL; Mullen LA; Amir T; Alvin MD; Jones MK; Ambinder EB; Falomo ET; Harvey SC
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1505-1512. PubMed ID: 30772138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.