These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32172057)

  • 1. The role of ferric coagulant on gypsum scaling and ion interception efficiency in nanofiltration at different pH values: Performance and mechanism.
    Lin D; Bai L; Gan Z; Zhao J; Li G; Aminabhavi TM; Liang H
    Water Res; 2020 May; 175():115695. PubMed ID: 32172057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inorganic coagulant induced gypsum scaling in nanofiltration process: Effects of coagulant concentration, coagulant conditioning time and fouling strategies.
    Lin D; Yan Z; Tang X; Wang J; Liang H; Li G
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 670():685-695. PubMed ID: 30921708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced gypsum scaling by organic fouling layer on nanofiltration membrane: Characteristics and mechanisms.
    Wang J; Wang L; Miao R; Lv Y; Wang X; Meng X; Yang R; Zhang X
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():203-13. PubMed ID: 26799710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of membrane fouling for in-line filtration of oil sands process-affected water: the effects of pretreatment conditions.
    Kim ES; Liu Y; Gamal El-Din M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2877-84. PubMed ID: 22279959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of coagulation with ferric chloride as a pretreatment for fouling reduction during nanofiltration of rendering plant secondary effluent.
    Racar M; Dolar D; Špehar A; Kraš A; Košutić K
    Chemosphere; 2017 Aug; 181():485-491. PubMed ID: 28460295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fouling behavior of nanofiltration membrane during the refining treatment of morphlines-dominant reverse osmosis concentrate.
    Li Y; Dong Y; Chen S; Wu Y; Wang J; Nie Y
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jul; 364():121443. PubMed ID: 38878575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of operational parameters on cake formation of CaSO4 in nanofiltration.
    Lin CJ; Shirazi S; Rao P; Agarwal S
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(4):806-16. PubMed ID: 16427114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane fouling by natural organic matter: Mechanisms and mitigation by pre-ozonation and pH.
    Yu W; Liu T; Crawshaw J; Liu T; Graham N
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():353-362. PubMed ID: 29665507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrasting mixed scaling patterns and mechanisms of nanofiltration and membrane distillation.
    Zheng L; Wu Q; Ulbricht M; Zhong H; Duan N; Van der Bruggen B; Wei Y
    Water Res; 2024 Jul; 258():121671. PubMed ID: 38749186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New insights into the influence of pre-oxidation on membrane fouling during nanofiltration of brackish water considering inorganic-organic complexation and oxidant reduction byproducts.
    Lin D; Zhang H; Wang Z; Xu D; Li G; Ulbricht M; Liang H
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 905():167364. PubMed ID: 37769728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Achieving low concentrations of chromium in drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane performance and selection.
    Giagnorio M; Ruffino B; Grinic D; Steffenino S; Meucci L; Zanetti MC; Tiraferri A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25294-25305. PubMed ID: 29946838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimisation of combined coagulation and microfiltration for water treatment.
    Judd SJ; Hillis P
    Water Res; 2001 Aug; 35(12):2895-904. PubMed ID: 11471689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms.
    Li Q; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Sep; 38(17):4683-93. PubMed ID: 15461180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coagulation of humic acid by ferric chloride in saline (marine) water conditions.
    Duan J; Graham NJ; Wilson F
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 12578172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of magnetic field on membrane flux and CaCO3 crystallization in the unstirred dead-end NF process].
    Zhu AN; Zhu WP; Wang XL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2004 Sep; 25(5):70-4. PubMed ID: 15623026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arsenate removal using a combination treatment of precipitation and nanofiltration.
    Chang FF; Liu WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 22233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving Ion Rejection of Conductive Nanofiltration Membrane through Electrically Enhanced Surface Charge Density.
    Zhang H; Quan X; Fan X; Yi G; Chen S; Yu H; Chen Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 53(2):868-877. PubMed ID: 30540165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.