217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32172456)
1. Intermittent catheterization with single- or multiple-reuse catheters: clinical study on safety and impact on quality of life.
Newman DK; New PW; Heriseanu R; Petronis S; Håkansson J; Håkansson MÅ; Lee BB
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Aug; 52(8):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 32172456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized Clinical Trial Using Sterile Single Use and Reused Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization with a Clean Technique in Spina Bifida Cases: Short-Term Urinary Tract Infection Outcomes.
Madero-Morales PA; Robles-Torres JI; Vizcarra-Mata G; Guillén-Lozoya AH; Mendoza-Olazarán S; Garza-González E; Gutiérrez-González A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):153-158. PubMed ID: 30916625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.
Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reuse versus single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status.
Håkansson MÅ
Spinal Cord; 2014 Jul; 52(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 24861702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization.
Chartier-Kastler E; Amarenco G; Lindbo L; Soljanik I; Andersen HL; Bagi P; Gjødsbøl K; Domurath B
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):942-7. PubMed ID: 23587630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the microbiological milieu of patients randomized to either hydrophilic or conventional PVC catheters for clean intermittent catheterization.
Lucas EJ; Baxter C; Singh C; Mohamed AZ; Li B; Zhang J; Jayanthi VR; Koff SA; VanderBrink B; Justice SS
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Jun; 12(3):172.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26951923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clean intermittent catheterization revisited.
Lamin E; Newman DK
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Jun; 48(6):931-9. PubMed ID: 26956983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(1):1-153. PubMed ID: 30847008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.
Prieto J; Murphy CL; Moore KN; Fader M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD006008. PubMed ID: 25208303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMC Urol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28073354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current evidence on intermittent catheterization: sterile single-use catheters or clean reused catheters and the incidence of UTI.
Getliffe K; Fader M; Allen C; Pinar K; Moore KN
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 17505249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urinary Tract Infection in Pediatric Patients on Clean Intermittent Catheterization via a Mitrofanoff port with Reused Catheters - Any Association with Catheter Sterility?
Sam CJ; Jagadeesan CT; Sen S; Arunachalam P; Appalaraju B; Das PT
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg; 2020; 25(2):91-95. PubMed ID: 32139987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An effective evidence-based cleaning method for the safe reuse of intermittent urinary catheters: In vitro testing.
Wilks SA; Morris NS; Thompson R; Prieto JA; Macaulay M; Moore KN; Keevil CW; Fader M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Mar; 39(3):907-915. PubMed ID: 32207551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adoption of Single-Use Clean Intermittent Catheterization Policies Does Not Appear to Affect Genitourinary Outcomes in a Large Spinal Cord Injury Cohort.
Elliott CS; Dallas K; Shem K; Crew J
J Urol; 2022 Nov; 208(5):1055-1074. PubMed ID: 35748685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications and patient satisfaction with urethral clean intermittent catheterization in spina bifida patients: comparing coated vs uncoated catheters.
Burki T; Abasher A; Alshahrani A; Al Hams AW; Ibrahim H; Albadawe H; Al Modhen F; Jamalalail Y; Al Shammari A
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):646-650. PubMed ID: 31699601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety of a new compact catheter for men with neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a randomised, crossover and open-labelled study.
Chartier-Kastler E; Lauge I; Ruffion A; Goossens D; Charvier K; Biering-Sørensen F
Spinal Cord; 2011 Jul; 49(7):844-50. PubMed ID: 21339763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiuse Catheters for Clean Intermittent Catheterization in Urinary Retention: Is There Evidence of Inferiority?
van Doorn T; Blok BFM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):809-810. PubMed ID: 31606472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bladder-emptying methods, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and impact on quality of life in people with long-term spinal cord injury.
Adriaansen JJ; van Asbeck FW; Tepper M; Faber WX; Visser-Meily JM; de Kort LM; Post MW
J Spinal Cord Med; 2017 Jan; 40(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 26446581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liao X; Liu Y; Liang S; Li K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Jul; 54(7):1461-1470. PubMed ID: 35449382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of the patient report of intermittent catheterization experience (PRICE) study.
Roberson D; Newman DK; Ziemba JB; Wein A; Stambakio H; Hamilton RG; Callender L; Holderbaum L; King T; Jackson A; Tran T; Lin G; Smith AL
Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Nov; 40(8):2008-2019. PubMed ID: 34516673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
