179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32173149)
1. Classification of Voice Disorders Using a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.
Fujimura S; Kojima T; Okanoue Y; Shoji K; Inoue M; Omori K; Hori R
J Voice; 2022 Jan; 36(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 32173149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic GRBAS Scoring of Pathological Voices using Deep Learning and a Small Set of Labeled Voice Data.
Hidaka S; Lee Y; Nakanishi M; Wakamiya K; Nakagawa T; Kaburagi T
J Voice; 2022 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 36437171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual Rating Scales and Objective Voice Measures in Children With Voice Disorders.
Fujiki RB; Thibeault SL
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jan; 30(1):228-238. PubMed ID: 33439742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective Assessment of Pathological Voice Using Artificial Intelligence Based on the GRBAS Scale.
Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hasebe K; Okanoue Y; Shuya O; Yuki R; Shoji K; Hori R; Kishimoto Y; Omori K
J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):561-566. PubMed ID: 34973892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Noise on Deep Learning for Classification of Pathological Voice.
Hasebe K; Kojima T; Fujimura S; Tamura K; Kawai Y; Kishimoto Y; Omori K
Laryngoscope; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38280184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic parameters for classification of breathiness in continuous speech according to the GRBAS scale.
Stráník A; Čmejla R; Vokřál J
J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):653.e9-653.e17. PubMed ID: 24755168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli.
Brinca L; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Pinto PN; Araújo L
J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):776.e7-14. PubMed ID: 25795348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audio-perceptual evaluation of Portuguese voice disorders-an inter- and intrajudge reliability study.
Vaz Freitas S; Pestana PM; Almeida V; Ferreira A
J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 24050822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD
J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
Lu FL; Matteson S
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
