589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32173325)
1. Design and validation of a low-cost, high-fidelity model for robotic pyeloplasty simulation training.
Timberlake MD; Garbens A; Schlomer BJ; Kavoussi NL; Kern AJM; Peters CA; Gahan JC
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Jun; 16(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 32173325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty surgical simulation using a 3D-printed silicone-based model: development, face validation and crowdsourced learning outcomes assessment.
Bendre HH; Rajender A; Barbosa PV; Wason SEL
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 32240498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and Validation of a Low-Cost, High-Fidelity Model for Urethrovesical Anastomosis in Radical Prostatectomy.
Johnson BA; Timberlake M; Steinberg RL; Kosemund M; Mueller B; Gahan JC
J Endourol; 2019 Apr; 33(4):331-336. PubMed ID: 30734578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum.
Volpe A; Ahmed K; Dasgupta P; Ficarra V; Novara G; van der Poel H; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 25454612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skills: an adjunct to urology resident surgical simulation training.
Holst D; Kowalewski TM; White LW; Brand TC; Harper JD; Sorenson MD; Kirsch S; Lendvay TS
J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):604-9. PubMed ID: 25356517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single Session of Robotic Human Cadaver Training: The Immediate Impact on Urology Residents in a Teaching Hospital.
Bertolo R; Garisto J; Dagenais J; Sagalovich D; Kaouk JH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1157-1162. PubMed ID: 29708828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of Virtual Reality Simulation and Dry Lab Robotic Technical Skills.
Newcomb LK; Bradley MS; Truong T; Tang M; Comstock B; Li YJ; Visco AG; Siddiqui NY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):689-696. PubMed ID: 29154932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Cheung CL; Looi T; Lendvay TS; Drake JM; Farhat WA
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 24776857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows.
Tasian GE; Wiebe DJ; Casale P
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4 Suppl):1622-6. PubMed ID: 23410982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Randomized Comparison of 2 Robotic Virtual Reality Simulators and Evaluation of Trainees' Skills Transfer to a Simulated Robotic Urethrovesical Anastomosis Task.
Hoogenes J; Wong N; Al-Harbi B; Kim KS; Vij S; Bolognone E; Quantz M; Guo Y; Shayegan B; Matsumoto ED
Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():110-115. PubMed ID: 29054720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the RobotiX Mentor Robotic Surgery Simulator.
Whittaker G; Aydin A; Raison N; Kum F; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 26576836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of robotic simulation by trainees in residency programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association.
Thiel DD; Patel VR; Larson T; Lannen A; Leveillee RJ
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 24016366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structured learning for robotic surgery utilizing a proficiency score: a pilot study.
Hung AJ; Bottyan T; Clifford TG; Serang S; Nakhoda ZK; Shah SH; Yokoi H; Aron M; Gill IS
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 27106491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a Simulation Model for Robotic Myomectomy.
Schneyer RJ; Scheib SA; Green IC; Molina AL; Mara KC; Wright KN; Siedhoff MT; Truong MD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):330-340.e1. PubMed ID: 38307222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Chow AK; Wong R; Monda S; Bhatt R; Sands KG; Vetter J; Badhiwala N; DeClue A; Kim EH; Sivaraman A; Venkatesh R; Figenshau RS; Du K
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):878-884. PubMed ID: 33261512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy.
Hung AJ; Shah SH; Dalag L; Shin D; Gill IS
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 25801765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.
Goh AC; Goldfarb DW; Sander JC; Miles BJ; Dunkin BJ
J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 22099993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion of Robotic Technology Into Urologic Practice has Led to Improved Resident Physician Robotic Skills.
Schommer E; Patel VR; Mouraviev V; Thomas C; Thiel DD
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27488814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
