165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32173757)
1. Response to "Does Sub-SMAS Buccal Fat Pad Transposition Augment Malar Volume in Facelift Patients?".
Bitik O
Aesthet Surg J; 2020 May; 40(6):NP419-NP420. PubMed ID: 32173757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does Sub-SMAS Buccal Fat Pad Transposition Augment Malar Volume in Facelift Patients?
Swanson E
Aesthet Surg J; 2020 May; 40(6):NP416-NP418. PubMed ID: 31675059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sub-SMAS Transposition of the Buccal Fat Pad.
Bitik O
Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Mar; 40(4):NP114-NP122. PubMed ID: 31111860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Periauricular Purse-String Reinforced with SMAS plication and Malaria Fat Pad Elevation for Mid-and Lower Facial Rejuvenation: FACE-Q Report.
Wang R; Yang J; Guo K; Zhong A; Tong J; Xiong L; Sun J
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 81(6S Suppl 1):S59-S65. PubMed ID: 30418281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suprafibromuscular facelifting with periosteal suspension of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system and fat pad of Bichat rotation. Tightening the net.
Keller GS; Cray J
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1996 Apr; 122(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 8600921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel Volumizing Extended Deep-Plane Facelift: Using Composite Flap Shifts to Volumize the Midface and Jawline.
Jacono AA
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Aug; 28(3):331-368. PubMed ID: 32503718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Lift-and-Fill Facelift: Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Manipulation with Fat Compartment Augmentation.
Rohrich RJ; Durand PD; Dayan E
Clin Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 46(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 31514804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High SMAS Facelift: Combined Single Flap Lifting of the Midface, Cheek, and Jawline.
Marten T; Elyassnia D
Facial Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 38(6):593-612. PubMed ID: 36563671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fat Grafting to Improve Results of Facelift: Systematic Review of Safety and Effectiveness of Current Treatment Paradigms.
Molina-Burbano F; Smith JM; Ingargiola MJ; Motakef S; Sanati P; Lu J; Taub PJ; Hill ME
Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jan; 41(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 31907534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Extended Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System.
Charafeddine AH; Zins JE
Clin Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 46(4):533-546. PubMed ID: 31514806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined approach for facial contour restoration: treatment of malar and cheek areas during rhytidectomy.
Tapia A; Ruiz-de-Erenchun R; Rengifo M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Aug; 118(2):491-7; discussion 498-501. PubMed ID: 16874222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Key Structure of the Facial Soft Tissue: The Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System.
Watanabe K; Han A; Inoue E; Iwanaga J; Tabira Y; Yamashita A; Kikuchi K; Haikata Y; Nooma K; Saga T
Kurume Med J; 2023 Jul; 68(2):53-61. PubMed ID: 37062726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total Composite Flap Facelift and the Deep-Plane Transition Zone: A Critical Consideration in SMAS-Release Midface Lifting.
Mani M
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 May; 36(5):533-45. PubMed ID: 26931306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Facial Fat Compartments Revisited: Clinical Relevance to Subcutaneous Dissection and Facial Deflation in Face Lifting.
Stuzin JM; Rohrich RJ; Dayan E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov; 144(5):1070-1078. PubMed ID: 31688754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nuances in Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Rhytidectomy.
Rousso DE; Adams AS
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Aug; 28(3):285-301. PubMed ID: 32503715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the SMAS Flap Facelift Safe? A Comparison of Complications Between the Sub-SMAS Approach Versus the Subcutaneous Approach With or Without SMAS Plication in Aesthetic Rhytidectomy at an Academic Institution.
Rammos CK; Mohan AT; Maricevich MA; Maricevich RL; Adair MJ; Jacobson SR
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):870-6. PubMed ID: 26311561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Utility of Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Flaps in Facelift Procedures.
Damitz LA
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 80(6S Suppl 6):S406-S409. PubMed ID: 29668506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External Approach to Buccal Fat Excision in Facelift: Anatomy and Technique.
Surek CC; Kochuba AL; Said SA; Cho KH; Swanson M; Duraes E; McBride J; Drake RL; Zins JE
Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Apr; 41(5):527-534. PubMed ID: 31965150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facelift Surgery Turns Back the Clock: Artificial Intelligence and Patient Satisfaction Quantitate Value of Procedure Type and Specific Techniques.
Gibstein AR; Chen K; Nakfoor B; Lu SM; Cheng R; Thorne CH; Bradley JP
Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Aug; 41(9):987-999. PubMed ID: 33217756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Five Ds for Safe and Effective Buccal Fat Removal.
Rohrich RJ; Jalalabadi F
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Mar; 151(3):546-548. PubMed ID: 36730489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
