275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32174400)
21. Development, characterization and sterilisation of Nanocellulose-alginate-(hyaluronic acid)- bioinks and 3D bioprinted scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Lafuente-Merchan M; Ruiz-Alonso S; Espona-Noguera A; Galvez-Martin P; López-Ruiz E; Marchal JA; López-Donaire ML; Zabala A; Ciriza J; Saenz-Del-Burgo L; Pedraz JL
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Jul; 126():112160. PubMed ID: 34082965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biofabrication of valentine-shaped heart with a composite hydrogel and sacrificial material.
Zou Q; Grottkau BE; He Z; Shu L; Yang L; Ma M; Ye C
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Mar; 108():110205. PubMed ID: 31924015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 3D printing of self-standing and vascular supportive multimaterial hydrogel structures for organ engineering.
Liu S; Hu Q; Shen Z; Krishnan S; Zhang H; Ramalingam M
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2022 Jan; 119(1):118-133. PubMed ID: 34617587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 3D Bioprinting of Low-Concentration Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy.
Yin J; Yan M; Wang Y; Fu J; Suo H
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 Feb; 10(8):6849-6857. PubMed ID: 29405059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microfluidic Bioprinting of Heterogeneous 3D Tissue Constructs.
Colosi C; Costantini M; Barbetta A; Dentini M
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1612():369-380. PubMed ID: 28634956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An injectable bioink with rapid prototyping in the air and
Zhou Y; Liao S; Chu Y; Yuan B; Tao X; Hu X; Wang Y
Biofabrication; 2021 Sep; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 34488216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 3D bioprinting of mechanically tuned bioinks derived from cardiac decellularized extracellular matrix.
Shin YJ; Shafranek RT; Tsui JH; Walcott J; Nelson A; Kim DH
Acta Biomater; 2021 Jan; 119():75-88. PubMed ID: 33166713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cell-laden four-dimensional bioprinting using near-infrared-triggered shape-morphing alginate/polydopamine bioinks.
Luo Y; Lin X; Chen B; Wei X
Biofabrication; 2019 Sep; 11(4):045019. PubMed ID: 31394520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 3D printing of vascularized hepatic tissues with a high cell density and heterogeneous microenvironment.
Fang Y; Ji M; Yang Y; Guo Y; Sun R; Zhang T; Sun W; Xiong Z
Biofabrication; 2023 Jul; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 37429291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting.
Panwar A; Tan LP
Molecules; 2016 May; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 27231892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 3D printed TCP-based scaffold incorporating VEGF-loaded PLGA microspheres for craniofacial tissue engineering.
Fahimipour F; Rasoulianboroujeni M; Dashtimoghadam E; Khoshroo K; Tahriri M; Bastami F; Lobner D; Tayebi L
Dent Mater; 2017 Nov; 33(11):1205-1216. PubMed ID: 28882369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Enhanced rheological behaviors of alginate hydrogels with carrageenan for extrusion-based bioprinting.
Kim MH; Lee YW; Jung WK; Oh J; Nam SY
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Oct; 98():187-194. PubMed ID: 31252328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology.
Zhao Y; Li Y; Mao S; Sun W; Yao R
Biofabrication; 2015 Nov; 7(4):045002. PubMed ID: 26523399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrohydrodynamic-direct-printed cell-laden microfibrous structure using alginate-based bioink for effective myotube formation.
Yeo M; Kim G
Carbohydr Polym; 2021 Nov; 272():118444. PubMed ID: 34420709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of transglutaminase cross-linking process on printability of gelatin microgel-gelatin solution composite bioink.
Song K; Ren B; Zhai Y; Chai W; Huang Y
Biofabrication; 2021 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 34823234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A 3D cell printed muscle construct with tissue-derived bioink for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss.
Choi YJ; Jun YJ; Kim DY; Yi HG; Chae SH; Kang J; Lee J; Gao G; Kong JS; Jang J; Chung WK; Rhie JW; Cho DW
Biomaterials; 2019 Jun; 206():160-169. PubMed ID: 30939408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Printing 3D vagina tissue analogues with vagina decellularized extracellular matrix bioink.
Hou C; Zheng J; Li Z; Qi X; Tian Y; Zhang M; Zhang J; Huang X
Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Jun; 180():177-186. PubMed ID: 33737175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Employing PEG crosslinkers to optimize cell viability in gel phase bioinks and tailor post printing mechanical properties.
Rutz AL; Gargus ES; Hyland KE; Lewis PL; Setty A; Burghardt WR; Shah RN
Acta Biomater; 2019 Nov; 99():121-132. PubMed ID: 31539655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nanoengineered Osteoinductive Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Bone Tissue.
Chimene D; Miller L; Cross LM; Jaiswal MK; Singh I; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(14):15976-15988. PubMed ID: 32091189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Engineering a Chemically Defined Hydrogel Bioink for Direct Bioprinting of Microvasculature.
Barrs RW; Jia J; Ward M; Richards DJ; Yao H; Yost MJ; Mei Y
Biomacromolecules; 2021 Feb; 22(2):275-288. PubMed ID: 33332959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
