These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3217474)

  • 21. 'Generic-view principle' for three-dimensional-motion perception: optics and inverse optics of a moving straight bar.
    Kitazaki M; Shimojo S
    Perception; 1996; 25(7):797-814. PubMed ID: 8923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using stereokinetic effect to convey depth: computationally efficient depth-from-motion displays.
    Kaiser MK; Proffitt DR
    Hum Factors; 1992 Oct; 34(5):571-81. PubMed ID: 1459567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rigidity and misperceived motion.
    Ullman S
    Perception; 1984; 13(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 6504682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The perceived motion of a stereokinetic stimulus.
    Rokers B; Yuille A; Liu Z
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2375-87. PubMed ID: 16540141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast.
    Anstis SM; Rogers BJ
    Vision Res; 1975; 15():957-61. PubMed ID: 1166630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A structural analysis of stability in the perceived form of objects rotating in depth.
    Rankin NO; Yablick GS
    Psychol Res; 1976 Oct; 39(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 1005628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Motion parallax information for direction of rotation in depth: order and direction components.
    Carpenter DL; Dugan MP
    Perception; 1983; 12(5):559-69. PubMed ID: 6676706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A counterexample to the rigidity assumption in the visual perception of structure from motion.
    Braunstein ML; Andersen GJ
    Perception; 1984; 13(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 6504681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth.
    Kersten D; Mamassian P; Knill DC
    Perception; 1997; 26(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 9274752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Saturn illusion: a new stereokinetic effect.
    Vallortigara G; Bressan P; Zanforlin M
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(5):811-3. PubMed ID: 3750862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Depth perception in moving line patterns.
    Shoji K; Sumi S; Fujita H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Dec; 51(3 Pt 1):683-7. PubMed ID: 7208209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of occlusion in reducing multistability in moving point-light displays.
    Proffitt DR; Bertenthal BI; Roberts RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Oct; 36(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 6522226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The detection of real and apparent concomitant rotation in a three-dimensional cube: implications for perceptual interactions.
    Peterson MA; Shyi GC
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jul; 44(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 3405727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Depth representation of moving 3-D objects in apparent-motion path.
    Hidaka S; Kawachi Y; Gyoba J
    Perception; 2008; 37(5):688-703. PubMed ID: 18605143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion.
    Hildreth EC; Grzywacz NM; Adelson EH; Inada VK
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jul; 48(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 2377437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of depth perception mediated by motion parallax in unidimensional projections of rotation in depth.
    Carpenter DL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1979 Oct; 28(2):280-99. PubMed ID: 501282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceived rigidity in motion-in-depth increases with contour perspective.
    Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2014; 43(6):481-98. PubMed ID: 25154283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A flaw in the explanation of the stereokinetic cone illusion and two guiding hypotheses for new research.
    Talasli U
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 1):823-9. PubMed ID: 8321593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The magic wand: a new stereokinetic anomalous surface.
    Zanforlin M; Vallortigara G
    Perception; 1990; 19(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 2096363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ambiguous pictorial depth cues and perceptions of nonrigid motion in the three-loop figure.
    Broerse J; Li R; Ashton R
    Perception; 1994; 23(9):1049-62. PubMed ID: 7899046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.