These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32174971)

  • 21. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Strategies for Obtaining and Pruning Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data for Genomic Prediction.
    Ye S; Gao N; Zheng R; Chen Z; Teng J; Yuan X; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang X; Li J; Zhang Z
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():673. PubMed ID: 31379929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The development and characterization of a 60K SNP chip for chicken.
    Groenen MA; Megens HJ; Zare Y; Warren WC; Hillier LW; Crooijmans RP; Vereijken A; Okimoto R; Muir WM; Cheng HH
    BMC Genomics; 2011 May; 12(1):274. PubMed ID: 21627800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application of genomic selection in farm animal breeding.
    Tan C; Bian C; Yang D; Li N; Wu ZF; Hu XX
    Yi Chuan; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29254921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
    Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Short communication: Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction of body conformation traits in Chinese Holsteins using markers derived from high-density marker panels.
    Song H; Li L; Ma P; Zhang S; Su G; Lund MS; Zhang Q; Ding X
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5250-5254. PubMed ID: 29550139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Weighting Strategies for Single-Step Genomic BLUP: An Iterative Approach for Accurate Calculation of GEBV and GWAS.
    Zhang X; Lourenco D; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():151. PubMed ID: 27594861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea.
    Iqbal A; Choi TJ; Kim YS; Lee YM; Zahangir Alam M; Jung JH; Choe HS; Kim JJ
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 31480201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An SNP-based saturated genetic map and QTL analysis of fruit-related traits in cucumber using specific-length amplified fragment (SLAF) sequencing.
    Wei Q; Wang Y; Qin X; Zhang Y; Zhang Z; Wang J; Li J; Lou Q; Chen J
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1158. PubMed ID: 25534138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle.
    Lopez BI; Lee SH; Park JE; Shin DH; Oh JD; de Las Heras-Saldana S; van der Werf J; Chai HH; Park W; Lim D
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 31817753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
    Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic Prediction Using Low Density Marker Panels in Aquaculture: Performance Across Species, Traits, and Genotyping Platforms.
    Kriaridou C; Tsairidou S; Houston RD; Robledo D
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():124. PubMed ID: 32174974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of genomic prediction within and across populations for nematode resistance and body weight traits in sheep.
    Riggio V; Abdel-Aziz M; Matika O; Moreno CR; Carta A; Bishop SC
    Animal; 2014 Apr; 8(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 24636823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction in Brangus cattle by adding animals with imputed low-density SNP genotypes.
    Lopes FB; Wu XL; Li H; Xu J; Perkins T; Genho J; Ferretti R; Tait RG; Bauck S; Rosa GJM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Feb; 135(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 29345073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.