449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32175821)
1. Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators.
Suver CM; Hamann JK; Chin EM; Goldstein FC; Blazel HM; Manzanares CM; Doerr MJ; Asthana SJ; Mangravite LM; Levey AI; Lah JJ; Edwards DF
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 32175821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation.
Killawi A; Khidir A; Elnashar M; Abdelrahim H; Hammoud M; Elliott H; Thurston M; Asad H; Al-Khal AL; Fetters MD
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Feb; 15():9. PubMed ID: 24495499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "I passed the test!" Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa.
Masiye F; Mayosi B; de Vries J
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 28202021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase 3 Oncology Clinical Trials in South Africa: Experimentation or Therapeutic Misconception?
Malan T; Moodley K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 27106890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views.
Anderson EE; Newman SB; Matthews AK
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 28949896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed Consent, Therapeutic Misconception, and Unrealistic Optimism.
Jansen LA
Perspect Biol Med; 2020; 63(2):359-373. PubMed ID: 33416658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: a qualitative pilot study.
Khalil SS; Silverman HJ; Raafat M; El-Kamary S; El-Setouhy M
BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Aug; 8():9. PubMed ID: 17727728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The psychology of "cure" - unique challenges to consent processes in HIV cure research in South Africa.
Moodley K; Staunton C; Rossouw T; de Roubaix M; Duby Z; Skinner D
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 30678664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research with Alzheimer's disease subjects: informed consent and proxy decision making.
High DM
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1992 Sep; 40(9):950-7. PubMed ID: 1512393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali.
Traore K; Bull S; Niare A; Konate S; Thera MA; Kwiatkowski D; Parker M; Doumbo OK
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 16():42. PubMed ID: 26077875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gatekeeping in cancer clinical trials in Canada: The ethics of recruiting the "ideal" patient.
Bell JAH; Kelly MT; Gelmon K; Chi K; Ho A; Rodney P; Balneaves LG
Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4107-4113. PubMed ID: 32314549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.
McWhirter RE; Eckstein L
J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun; 15(2):243-257. PubMed ID: 29532387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam.
Van Nuil JI; Nguyen TTT; Le Nguyen TN; Nguyen VVC; Chambers M; Ta TDN; Merson L; Nguyen TPD; Hoang MTV; Parker M; Bull S; Kestelyn E
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 31924199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.
Kraft SA; Porter KM; Duenas DM; Guerra C; Joseph G; Lee SS; Shipman KJ; Allen J; Eubanks D; Kauffman TL; Lindberg NM; Anderson K; Zepp JM; Gilmore MJ; Mittendorf KF; Shuster E; Muessig KR; Arnold B; Goddard KAB; Wilfond BS
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 32981477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four reasons why too many informed consents to clinical research are invalid: a critical analysis of current practices.
Wisgalla A; Hasford J
BMJ Open; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e050543. PubMed ID: 35246415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.
Townsend A; Cox SM
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Oct; 14():40. PubMed ID: 24119203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.
Doerr M; Maguire Truong A; Bot BM; Wilbanks J; Suver C; Mangravite LM
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Feb; 5(2):e14. PubMed ID: 28209557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC).
Wade J; Elliott D; Avery KNL; Gaunt D; Young GJ; Barnes R; Paramasivan S; Campbell WB; Blazeby JM; Birtle AJ; Stein RC; Beard DJ; Halliday AW; Donovan JL; ; ; ; ; ;
Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):327. PubMed ID: 28716064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
