These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32175948)
1. McGrath Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Trial. Ruetzler K; Rivas E; Cohen B; Mosteller L; Martin A; Keebler A; Maheshwari K; Steckner K; Wang M; Praveen C; Khanna S; Makarova N; Sessler DI; Turan A Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):586-593. PubMed ID: 32175948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial. Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Maassen R; Lee R; Hermans B; Marcus M; van Zundert A Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1560-5. PubMed ID: 19713258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol. Kriege M; Alflen C; Tzanova I; Schmidtmann I; Piepho T; Noppens RR BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016907. PubMed ID: 28827261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study. Suzuki K; Kusunoki S; Tanigawa K; Shime N BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024927. PubMed ID: 30928937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations. Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The usefulness of the McGrath MAC laryngoscope in comparison with Airwayscope and Macintosh laryngoscope during routine nasotracheal intubation: a randomaized controlled trial. Sato Boku A; Sobue K; Kako E; Tachi N; Okumura Y; Kanazawa M; Hashimoto M; Harada J BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):160. PubMed ID: 29191160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study. Castillo-Monzón CG; Marroquín-Valz HA; Fernández-Villacañas-Marín M; Moreno-Cascales M; García-Rojo B; Candia-Arana CA J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():136-141. PubMed ID: 28183552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer]. Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Lewis SR; Butler AR; Parker J; Cook TM; Smith AF Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD011136. PubMed ID: 27844477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath video laryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope; a randomized trial. Karaman T; Dogru S; Karaman S; Demir S; Kaya Z; Suren M; Arici S; Kahveci M; Alim S J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():358-64. PubMed ID: 27687410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tracheal tube placement in patients with a good glottic view at direct laryngoscopy. Yao WL; Wan L; Xu H; Qian W; Wang XR; Tian YK; Zhang CH Anaesthesia; 2015 Jul; 70(7):810-7. PubMed ID: 25721326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the McGrath Giraudon A; Bordes-Demolis M; Blondeau B; Sibai de Panthou N; Ferrand N; Bello M; Dahlet V; Semjen F; Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2017 Oct; 36(5):261-265. PubMed ID: 28323237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients. Abdallah R; Galway U; You J; Kurz A; Sessler DI; Doyle DJ Anesth Analg; 2011 Nov; 113(5):1082-7. PubMed ID: 21918156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study. Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hoshijima H; Denawa Y; Tominaga A; Nakamura C; Shiga T; Nagasaka H J Clin Anesth; 2018 Feb; 44():69-75. PubMed ID: 29156438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Truview PCD™ and the GlideScope(®) video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial. Riveros R; Sung W; Sessler DI; Sanchez IP; Mendoza ML; Mascha EJ; Niezgoda J Can J Anaesth; 2013 May; 60(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 23435693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]