These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32176698)

  • 21. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.
    Schmidtlein CR; Beattie BJ; Bailey DL; Akhurst TJ; Wang W; Gönen M; Kirov AS; Humm JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.
    Fooladi M; Soleymani Y; Rahmim A; Farzanefar S; Aghahosseini F; Seyyedi N; Sh Zadeh P
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111349. PubMed ID: 38310673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
    Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of a deep learning enhancement method applied to PET images acquired with a reduced acquisition time.
    Ciborowski K; Gramek-Jedwabna A; Gołąb M; Miechowicz I; Szczurek J; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2023; 26(0):116-122. PubMed ID: 37786943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treatment response assessment in [
    Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C
    Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
    Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
    Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
    EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.
    Shiri I; Rahmim A; Ghaffarian P; Geramifar P; Abdollahi H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4498-4509. PubMed ID: 28567548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of image reconstruction methods on quantitative accuracy and variability of FDG-PET volumetric and textural measures in solid tumors.
    Ketabi A; Ghafarian P; Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Mahdavi SR; Rahmim A; Ay MR
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):2146-2156. PubMed ID: 30280249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of alterations in positron emission tomography imaging parameters on radiomics features.
    Ger RB; Meier JG; Pahlka RB; Gay S; Mumme R; Fuller CD; Li H; Howell RM; Layman RR; Stafford RJ; Zhou S; Mawlawi O; Court LE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221877. PubMed ID: 31487307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
    Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
    Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
    Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reducing Radiation Exposure to Paediatric Patients Undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging.
    Kertész H; Beyer T; London K; Saleh H; Chung D; Rausch I; Cal-Gonzalez J; Kitsos T; Kench PL
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):775-786. PubMed ID: 33846898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
    Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT using point spread function reconstruction for nodal staging of colorectal cancer.
    Kawashima K; Kato K; Tomabechi M; Matsuo M; Otsuka K; Ishida K; Nakamura R; Ehara S
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150938. PubMed ID: 27146065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
    Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity of Image Features to Noise in Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer: Uncorrelated Noise Effects.
    Oliver JA; Budzevich M; Hunt D; Moros EG; Latifi K; Dilling TJ; Feygelman V; Zhang G
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Oct; 16(5):595-608. PubMed ID: 27502957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.
    Markiewicz PJ; da Costa-Luis C; Dickson J; Barnes A; Krokos G; MacKewn J; Clark T; Wimberley C; MacNaught G; Yaqub MM; Gispert JD; Hutton BF; Marsden P; Hammers A; Reader AJ; Ourselin S; Herholz K; Matthews JC; Barkhof F
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3298-3313. PubMed ID: 35271742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
    Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.