BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32176769)

  • 1. Somatic selection distinguishes oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.
    Chandrashekar P; Ahmadinejad N; Wang J; Sekulic A; Egan JB; Asmann YW; Kumar S; Maley C; Liu L
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1712-1717. PubMed ID: 32176769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistically identifying tumor suppressors and oncogenes from pan-cancer genome-sequencing data.
    Kumar RD; Searleman AC; Swamidass SJ; Griffith OL; Bose R
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 31(22):3561-8. PubMed ID: 26209800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DORGE: Discovery of Oncogenes and tumoR suppressor genes using Genetic and Epigenetic features.
    Lyu J; Li JJ; Su J; Peng F; Chen YE; Ge X; Li W
    Sci Adv; 2020 Nov; 6(46):. PubMed ID: 33177077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types.
    Sudhakar M; Rengaswamy R; Raman K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 34997044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes: comparative genomics and network perspectives.
    Zhu K; Liu Q; Zhou Y; Tao C; Zhao Z; Sun J; Xu H
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S8. PubMed ID: 26099335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative haploinsufficiency and triplosensitivity drive aneuploidy patterns and shape the cancer genome.
    Davoli T; Xu AW; Mengwasser KE; Sack LM; Yoon JC; Park PJ; Elledge SJ
    Cell; 2013 Nov; 155(4):948-62. PubMed ID: 24183448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SomInaClust: detection of cancer genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering.
    Van den Eynden J; Fierro AC; Verbeke LP; Marchal K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 16():125. PubMed ID: 25903787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IDENTIFY CANCER DRIVER GENES THROUGH SHARED MENDELIAN DISEASE PATHOGENIC VARIANTS AND CANCER SOMATIC MUTATIONS.
    Ma M; Wang C; Glicksberg BS; Schadt EE; Li SD; Chen R
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2017; 22():473-484. PubMed ID: 27896999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The co-regulatory networks of tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, and miRNAs in colorectal cancer.
    Slattery ML; Herrick JS; Mullany LE; Samowitz WS; Sevens JR; Sakoda L; Wolff RK
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2017 Nov; 56(11):769-787. PubMed ID: 28675510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of oncogenic and clinically actionable mutations in cancer genomes critically depends on variant calling tools.
    Garcia-Prieto CA; Martínez-Jiménez F; Valencia A; Porta-Pardo E
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(12):3181-3191. PubMed ID: 35512388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of signals of positive and negative selection to distinguish cancer genes and passenger genes.
    Bányai L; Trexler M; Kerekes K; Csuka O; Patthy L
    Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33427197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Mouse-Specific Model to Detect Genes under Selection in Tumors.
    Chen H; Shu J; Maley CC; Liu L
    Cancers (Basel); 2023 Oct; 15(21):. PubMed ID: 37958330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. OncodriveROLE classifies cancer driver genes in loss of function and activating mode of action.
    Schroeder MP; Rubio-Perez C; Tamborero D; Gonzalez-Perez A; Lopez-Bigas N
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):i549-55. PubMed ID: 25161246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. OncoVar: an integrated database and analysis platform for oncogenic driver variants in cancers.
    Wang T; Ruan S; Zhao X; Shi X; Teng H; Zhong J; You M; Xia K; Sun Z; Mao F
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Jan; 49(D1):D1289-D1301. PubMed ID: 33179738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine Learning Classification and Structure-Functional Analysis of Cancer Mutations Reveal Unique Dynamic and Network Signatures of Driver Sites in Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressor Genes.
    Agajanian S; Odeyemi O; Bischoff N; Ratra S; Verkhivker GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Oct; 58(10):2131-2150. PubMed ID: 30253099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct and competitive regulatory patterns of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes in ovarian cancer.
    Zhao M; Sun J; Zhao Z
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44175. PubMed ID: 22952919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitfalls in experimental designs for characterizing the transcriptional, methylational and copy number changes of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.
    Zhang Y; Xia J; Zhang Y; Qin Y; Yang D; Qi L; Zhao W; Wang C; Guo Z
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58163. PubMed ID: 23472150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-Omic Data Improve Prediction of Personalized Tumor Suppressors and Oncogenes.
    Sudhakar M; Rengaswamy R; Raman K
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():854190. PubMed ID: 35620468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. QuaDMutNetEx: a method for detecting cancer driver genes with low mutation frequency.
    Bokhari Y; Alhareeri A; Arodz T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):122. PubMed ID: 32293263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SB Driver Analysis: a Sleeping Beauty cancer driver analysis framework for identifying and prioritizing experimentally actionable oncogenes and tumor suppressors.
    Newberg JY; Black MA; Jenkins NA; Copeland NG; Mann KM; Mann MB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Sep; 46(16):e94. PubMed ID: 29846651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.