These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32178574)

  • 1. Influence of Age at Cochlear Implantation and Frequency-to-Place Mismatch on Early Speech Recognition in Adults.
    Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; Dillon MT
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Jun; 162(6):926-932. PubMed ID: 32178574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: II. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Speech-Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Walia A; Shew MA; Varghese J; Lefler SM; Bhat A; Ortmann AJ; Herzog JA; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 38880958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Brown KD; Pillsbury HC; Dedmon MM; O'Connell BP
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 34772886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Cochlear Implant Quality of Life, But Not Speech Recognition.
    Sturm JJ; Ma C; McRackan TR; Schvartz-Leyzac KC
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2898-2905. PubMed ID: 38214299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.
    Fitzgerald MB; Sagi E; Morbiwala TA; Tan CT; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 23807089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between lateral wall electrode array insertion parameters and audiological outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.
    Thimsen V; Mantsopoulos K; Liebscher T; Taha L; Eisenhut F; Iro H; Hoppe U; Hornung J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jun; 280(6):2707-2714. PubMed ID: 36436080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception performance as a function of age at implantation among postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Mahmoud AF; Ruckenstein MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e286-91. PubMed ID: 25226375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Murr AT; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP; Buss E; King ER; Bucker AL; Dillon SA; Rooth MA; Dedmon MM; Brown KD; Dillon MT
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Sep; 131(9):2106-2111. PubMed ID: 34043247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
    Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.
    Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP; Giardina CK; Buss E; Brown KD; Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA; Adunka OF; Fitzpatrick DC
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):941-948. PubMed ID: 33369942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.
    Holden LK; Finley CC; Firszt JB; Holden TA; Brenner C; Potts LG; Gotter BD; Vanderhoof SS; Mispagel K; Heydebrand G; Skinner MW
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):342-60. PubMed ID: 23348845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The smaller the frequency-to-place mismatch the better the hearing outcomes in cochlear implant recipients?
    Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Vanderveken O; Topsakal V; Van Rompaey V
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 279(4):1875-1883. PubMed ID: 34131770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.
    Park E; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):637-43. PubMed ID: 22212763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delaying Cochlear Implantation Impacts Postoperative Speech Perception of Nontraditional Pediatric Candidates.
    Park LR; Perkins EL; Woodard JS; Brown KD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(3):182-187. PubMed ID: 33352551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes.
    O'Connell BP; Hunter JB; Haynes DS; Holder JT; Dedmon MM; Noble JH; Dawant BM; Wanna GB
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2352-2357. PubMed ID: 28304096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of consonant-vowel monosyllable perception and word recognition after cochlear implantation in elderly Japanese patients.
    Omichi R; Maeda Y; Sugaya A; Kataoka Y; Kariya S; Fukushima K; Nishizaki K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(11):1108-12. PubMed ID: 26113252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Johnson AD; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.