364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32179258)
1. Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial.
Song L; Tu S; Sun Z; Wang Y; Ding D; Guan C; Xie L; Escaned J; Fearon WF; Kirtane AJ; Serruys PW; Wijns W; Windecker S; Leon MB; Stone GW; Qiao S; Xu B;
Am Heart J; 2020 May; 223():72-80. PubMed ID: 32179258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial.
Xu B; Tu S; Song L; Jin Z; Yu B; Fu G; Zhou Y; Wang J; Chen Y; Pu J; Chen L; Qu X; Yang J; Liu X; Guo L; Shen C; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Pan H; Fu X; Liu J; Zhao Y; Escaned J; Wang Y; Fearon WF; Dou K; Kirtane AJ; Wu Y; Serruys PW; Yang W; Wijns W; Guan C; Leon MB; Qiao S; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2021 Dec; 398(10317):2149-2159. PubMed ID: 34742368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Zimmermann FM; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Desai M; Oldroyd KG; Park SJ; Reardon MJ; Wendler O; Woo J; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):619-626.e2. PubMed ID: 26386784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Functionally Complete vs Incomplete Revascularization: Insights From the FAVOR III China Trial.
Zhang R; Wang HY; Dou K; Yin D; Zhu C; Feng L; Zhou Y; Pu J; Zhang Q; Pan H; Mi J; Ye F; Cheng X; Guo N; Guan C; Song L; Qiao S; Tu S; Xu B; Stone GW;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; 15(24):2490-2502. PubMed ID: 36543443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions.
Song L; Xu B; Tu S; Guan C; Jin Z; Yu B; Fu G; Zhou Y; Wang J; Chen Y; Pu J; Chen L; Qu X; Yang J; Liu X; Guo L; Shen C; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Pan H; Zhang R; Liu J; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Dou K; Kirtane AJ; Wu Y; Wijns W; Yang W; Leon MB; Qiao S; Stone GW;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Nov; 80(22):2089-2101. PubMed ID: 36424680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QFR Assessment and Prognosis After Nonculprit PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Lee SH; Hong D; Shin D; Kim HK; Park KH; Choo EH; Kim CJ; Kim MC; Hong YJ; Ahn SG; Doh JH; Lee SY; Park SD; Lee HJ; Kang MG; Koh JS; Cho YK; Nam CW; Joh HS; Choi KH; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Jeong MH; Gwon HC; Hahn JY; Lee JM;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Oct; 16(19):2365-2379. PubMed ID: 37821181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes.
Jin Z; Xu B; Yang X; Jia R; Meng S; Hu H; Deng Y; Cao X; Ruan Y; Han J; Liu J; Qu X; Zhou Y; Wang J; Fu G; Yu B; Wang Y; Guan C; Song L; Tu S; Qiao S; Stone GW;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 80(13):1254-1264. PubMed ID: 36137676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial.
Biscaglia S; Verardi FM; Tebaldi M; Guiducci V; Caglioni S; Campana R; Scala A; Marrone A; Pompei G; Marchini F; Scancarello D; Pignatelli G; D'Amore SM; Colaiori I; Demola P; Di Serafino L; Tumscitz C; Penzo C; Erriquez A; Manfrini M; Campo G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Apr; 16(7):783-794. PubMed ID: 36898939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic Value of QFR Measured Immediately After Successful Stent Implantation: The International Multicenter Prospective HAWKEYE Study.
Biscaglia S; Tebaldi M; Brugaletta S; Cerrato E; Erriquez A; Passarini G; Ielasi A; Spitaleri G; Di Girolamo D; Mezzapelle G; Geraci S; Manfrini M; Pavasini R; Barbato E; Campo G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2079-2088. PubMed ID: 31563688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization.
Bär S; Kavaliauskaite R; Ueki Y; Otsuka T; Kelbæk H; Engstrøm T; Baumbach A; Roffi M; von Birgelen C; Ostojic M; Pedrazzini G; Kornowski R; Tüller D; Vukcevic V; Magro M; Losdat S; Windecker S; Räber L
J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 May; 10(9):e019052. PubMed ID: 33899509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Associated With Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Chen Y; Gao L; Vogel B; Tian F; Jin Q; Guo J; Sun Z; Yang W; Jin Z; Yu B; Fu G; Pu J; Qu X; Zhang Q; Zhao Y; Yu L; Guan C; Tu S; Qiao S; Xu B; Mehran R; Song L;
JACC Asia; 2024 Mar; 4(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 38463683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality.
Zhang R; Xu B; Dou K; Guan C; Zhao Y; Wang X; Zou T; Qiao Z; Xie L; Wang H; Yuan S; Song L; Tu S; Wang Y; Wijns W
Int J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 352():33-39. PubMed ID: 35101540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial.
Andersen BK; Sejr-Hansen M; Westra J; Campo G; Efterkhari A; Tu S; Escaned J; Koltowski L; Stähli BE; Erglis A; Jaruševičius G; Žiubrytė G; Råmunddal T; Liu T; Wijns W; Landmesser U; Maillard L; Matsuo H; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1358-e1364. PubMed ID: 36648404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of quantitative flow ratio-based percutaneous coronary intervention in an all-comers study.
Zhang R; Dou K; Guan C; Zou T; Zhang M; Yuan S; Qiao Z; Xie L; Sun Z; Song L; Qiao S; Stone GW; Xu B
EuroIntervention; 2022 Feb; 17(15):1240-1251. PubMed ID: 34219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation).
Fearon WF; Nishi T; De Bruyne B; Boothroyd DB; Barbato E; Tonino P; Jüni P; Pijls NHJ; Hlatky MA;
Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 29097450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Data simulation to forecast the outcomes of the FAVOR III China trial.
Wang Y; Song L; Guan C; Zhao Y; Chen G; Li W; Tu S; Qiao S; Kirtane AJ; Xu B
J Evid Based Med; 2023 Mar; 16(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 36632678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationale and design of the Flow Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multivessel ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FLOWER-MI) trial.
Puymirat E; Simon T; de Bruyne B; Montalescot G; Steg G; Cayla G; Durand-Zaleski I; Blanchard D; Danchin N; Chatellier G;
Am Heart J; 2020 Apr; 222():1-7. PubMed ID: 32000067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design and Rationale of the RIPCORD 2 Trial (Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Routine Pressure Wire Assessment With Conventional Angiography in the Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
Elguindy M; Stables R; Nicholas Z; Kemp I; Curzen N
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 Feb; 11(2):e004191. PubMed ID: 29449442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population.
Rubimbura V; Guillon B; Fournier S; Amabile N; Chi Pan C; Combaret N; Eeckhout E; Kibler M; Silvain J; Wijns W; Schiele F; Muller O; Meneveau N; Adjedj J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(6):1145-1153. PubMed ID: 31763775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
