145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32179838)
1. Efficacy of antiseptics in a novel 3-dimensional human plasma biofilm model (hpBIOM).
Besser M; Dietrich M; Weber L; Rembe JD; Stuermer EK
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4792. PubMed ID: 32179838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of probiotics on pathogen survival in an innovative human plasma biofilm model (hpBIOM).
Besser M; Terberger J; Weber L; Ghebremedhin B; Naumova EA; Arnold WH; Stuermer EK
J Transl Med; 2019 Jul; 17(1):243. PubMed ID: 31345229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm.
O'Donnell JA; Wu M; Cochrane NH; Belay E; Myntti MF; James GA; Ryan SP; Seyler TM
Bone Joint J; 2021 May; 103-B(5):908-915. PubMed ID: 33934664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antimicrobial Hypochlorous Wound Irrigation Solutions Demonstrate Lower Anti-biofilm Efficacy Against Bacterial Biofilm in a Complex
Rembe JD; Huelsboemer L; Plattfaut I; Besser M; Stuermer EK
Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():564513. PubMed ID: 33162949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Increases the Sensitivity of Biofilm-Grown Staphylococcus aureus to Membrane-Targeting Antiseptics and Antibiotics.
Orazi G; Ruoff KL; O'Toole GA
mBio; 2019 Jul; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 31363032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human skin biofilm model: translational impact on swabbing and debridement.
Dietrich M; Besser M; Debus ES; Smeets R; Stuermer EK
J Wound Care; 2023 Jul; 32(7):446-455. PubMed ID: 37405939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anti-Biofilm Effect of Octenidine and Polyhexanide on Uropathogenic Biofilm-Producing Bacteria.
Loose M; Naber KG; Purcell L; Wirth MP; Wagenlehner FME
Urol Int; 2021; 105(3-4):278-284. PubMed ID: 33401282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of antiseptics containing povidone-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride and ethacridine lactate against biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus measured with the novel biofilm-oriented antiseptics test.
Junka A; Bartoszewicz M; Smutnicka D; Secewicz A; Szymczyk P
Int Wound J; 2014 Dec; 11(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 23445335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antibiotics Enhance Prevention and Eradication Efficacy of Cathodic-Voltage-Controlled Electrical Stimulation against Titanium-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.
Canty MK; Hansen LA; Tobias M; Spencer S; Henry T; Luke-Marshall NR; Campagnari AA; Ehrensberger MT
mSphere; 2019 May; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 31043516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multimodel regime for evaluating effectiveness of antimicrobial wound care products in microbial biofilms.
Stoffel JJ; Kohler Riedi PL; Hadj Romdhane B
Wound Repair Regen; 2020 Jul; 28(4):438-447. PubMed ID: 32175636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro inhibitory activity of N-acetylcysteine on tympanostomy tube biofilms from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and quinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Jun Y; Youn CK; Jo ER; Cho SI
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Nov; 126():109622. PubMed ID: 31404783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dealing with biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus: In vitro evaluation of a novel aerosol formulation of silver sulfadiazine.
Moyano AJ; Mas CR; Colque CA; Smania AM
Burns; 2020 Feb; 46(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 31420266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial, Biofilm Inhibitory and Anti-infective Activity of Metallic Nanoparticles Against Pathogens MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01.
Aswathanarayan JB; Vittal RR
Pharm Nanotechnol; 2017; 5(2):148-153. PubMed ID: 28440203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative efficacies of topical antiseptic eardrops against biofilms from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and quinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Youn CK; Jun Y; Jo ER; Jang SJ; Song H; Cho SI
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):519-522. PubMed ID: 29909794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [THE ROLE OF ANTISEPTICS AND STRATEGY OF BIOFILM REMOVAL IN CHRONIC WOUND].
Kucisec-Tepes N
Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27220188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of chlorhexidine, polihexanide and tissue-tolerable plasma against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on polystyrene and silicone materials.
Hübner NO; Matthes R; Koban I; Rändler C; Müller G; Bender C; Kindel E; Kocher T; Kramer A
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2010; 23 Suppl():28-34. PubMed ID: 20829659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of the Human Plasma Biofilm Model (hpBIOM) to Identify Potential Therapeutic Targets for Wound Management of Chronic Infections.
Dietrich M; Besser M; Stuermer EK
Microorganisms; 2024 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 38399673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antimicrobial activity of clinically used antiseptics and wound irrigating agents in combination with wound dressings.
Hirsch T; Limoochi-Deli S; Lahmer A; Jacobsen F; Goertz O; Steinau HU; Seipp HM; Steinstraesser L
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1539-1545. PubMed ID: 21187812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modelling antisepsis using defined populations of facultative and anaerobic wound pathogens grown in a basally perfused biofilm model.
Oates A; Lindsay S; Mistry H; Ortega F; McBain AJ
Biofouling; 2018 May; 34(5):507-518. PubMed ID: 29873244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
