253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32180351)
1. A plan template-based automation solution using a commercial treatment planning system.
Huang X; Quan H; Zhao B; Zhou W; Chen C; Chen Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 May; 21(5):13-25. PubMed ID: 32180351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy.
Buschmann M; Sharfo AWM; Penninkhof J; Seppenwoolde Y; Goldner G; Georg D; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJM
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Apr; 194(4):333-342. PubMed ID: 29270648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can the Student Outperform the Master? A Plan Comparison Between Pinnacle Auto-Planning and Eclipse knowledge-Based RapidPlan Following a Prostate-Bed Plan Competition.
Smith A; Granatowicz A; Stoltenberg C; Wang S; Liang X; Enke CA; Wahl AO; Zhou S; Zheng D
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819851763. PubMed ID: 31177922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between two treatment planning systems for volumetric modulated arc therapy optimization for prostate cancer.
Lafond C; Gassa F; Odin C; Dréan G; Even J; De Crevoisier R; Pommier P; Manens JP; Biston MC
Phys Med; 2014 Feb; 30(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 23116552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An artificial intelligence-driven agent for real-time head-and-neck IMRT plan generation using conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN).
Li X; Wang C; Sheng Y; Zhang J; Wang W; Yin FF; Wu Q; Wu QJ; Ge Y
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2714-2723. PubMed ID: 33577108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic IMRT planning via static field fluence prediction (AIP-SFFP): a deep learning algorithm for real-time prostate treatment planning.
Li X; Zhang J; Sheng Y; Chang Y; Yin FF; Ge Y; Wu QJ; Wang C
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(17):175014. PubMed ID: 32663813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The development of a deep reinforcement learning network for dose-volume-constrained treatment planning in prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Sprouts D; Gao Y; Wang C; Jia X; Shen C; Chi Y
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Jun; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 35523130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated intensity modulated treatment planning: The expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO) system.
Zarepisheh M; Hong L; Zhou Y; Oh JH; Mechalakos JG; Hunt MA; Mageras GS; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2944-2954. PubMed ID: 31055858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Template-based automation of treatment planning in advanced radiotherapy: a comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation.
Cilla S; Ianiro A; Romano C; Deodato F; Macchia G; Buwenge M; Dinapoli N; Boldrini L; Morganti AG; Valentini V
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):423. PubMed ID: 31949178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application programming in C# environment with recorded user software interactions and its application in autopilot of VMAT/IMRT treatment planning.
Wang H; Xing L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):189-203. PubMed ID: 27929493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
Mathews J; French SB; Bhagroo S; Pant A; Nazareth DP
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6053-6067. PubMed ID: 32978967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation and evaluation of an intelligent automatic treatment planning robot for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Gao Y; Shen C; Jia X; Kyun Park Y
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jul; 184():109685. PubMed ID: 37120103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Algorithm for an automatic treatment planning system using a single-arc VMAT for prostate cancer.
Kodama T; Kudo S; Hatanaka S; Hariu M; Shimbo M; Takahashi T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 22(12):27-36. PubMed ID: 34623022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Assessment of an Automated Treatment Planning on Dose Escalation of Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.
Wang S; Zheng D; Lin C; Lei Y; Verma V; Smith A; Ma R; Enke CA; Zhou S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819851520. PubMed ID: 31195891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans.
Szeverinski P; Kowatsch M; Künzler T; Meinschad M; Clemens P; DeVries AF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):235-244. PubMed ID: 34151502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using measurable dosimetric quantities to characterize the inter-structural tradeoff in inverse planning.
Liu H; Dong P; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6804-6821. PubMed ID: 28447959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
