These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32180351)

  • 21. Quantitative comparison of automatic and manual IMRT optimization for prostate cancer: the benefits of DVH prediction.
    Yang Y; Li T; Yuan L; Ge Y; Yin FF; Lee WR; Wu QJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5204. PubMed ID: 26103191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm.
    Chow JCL; Jiang R; Xu L
    Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31103251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical VMAT machine parameter optimization for localized prostate cancer using deep reinforcement learning.
    Hrinivich WT; Bhattacharya M; Mekki L; McNutt T; Jia X; Li H; Song DY; Lee J
    Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):3972-3984. PubMed ID: 38669457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of a commercial automatic treatment planning system for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments.
    Gallio E; Giglioli FR; Girardi A; Guarneri A; Ricardi U; Ropolo R; Ragona R; Fiandra C
    Phys Med; 2018 Feb; 46():153-159. PubMed ID: 29519402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
    Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A feasibility study of automated inverse treatment planning for cancer of the prostate.
    Reinstein LE; Wang XH; Burman CM; Chen Z; Mohan R; Kutcher G; Leibel SA; Fuks Z
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 9422578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
    Amaloo C; Hayes L; Manning M; Liu H; Wiant D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):29-35. PubMed ID: 31313508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Voxel-based automatic multi-criteria optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Mai Y; Kong F; Yang Y; Zhou L; Li Y; Song T
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):241. PubMed ID: 30518381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multicriteria plan optimization in the hands of physicians: a pilot study in prostate cancer and brain tumors.
    Müller BS; Shih HA; Efstathiou JA; Bortfeld T; Craft D
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):168. PubMed ID: 29110689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fully automated treatment planning for MLC-based robotic radiotherapy.
    Schipaanboord BWK; Giżyńska MK; Rossi L; de Vries KC; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S
    Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4139-4147. PubMed ID: 34037258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of efficacy in automated plan generation for Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine.
    Pokharel S; Pacheco A; Tanner S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13539. PubMed ID: 35084090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system.
    Semenenko VA; Reitz B; Day E; Qi XS; Miften M; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5851-60. PubMed ID: 19175141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three IMRT advanced planning tools: A multi-institutional side-by-side comparison.
    Lu L; Sheng Y; Donaghue J; Liu Shen Z; Kolar M; Wu QJ; Xia P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):65-77. PubMed ID: 31364798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dosimetric comparison of single-beam multi-arc and 2-beam multi-arc VMAT optimization in the Monaco treatment planning system.
    Kalet AM; Richardson HL; Nikolaisen DA; Cao N; Lavilla MA; Dempsey C; Meyer J; Koh WJ; Russell KJ
    Med Dosim; 2017 Summer; 42(2):122-125. PubMed ID: 28476456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: a head-and-neck case study.
    Wu B; Pang D; Simari P; Taylor R; Sanguineti G; McNutt T
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021714. PubMed ID: 23387737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of an autonomous treatment planning strategy for radiation therapy with effective use of population-based prior data.
    Wang H; Dong P; Liu H; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 28133746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatizing a nonscripting TPS for optimizing clinical workflow and reoptimizing IMRT/VMAT plans.
    Ayala R; Ruiz G; Valdivielso T
    Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):409-414. PubMed ID: 30952384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Capability of leaf interdigitation with different inverse planning strategies in Monaco: an investigation of representative tumour sites.
    Duan J; Meng X; Liu T; Yin Y
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 11():82. PubMed ID: 27316707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using multicriteria optimization for localized prostate cancer.
    Ghandour S; Matzinger O; Pachoud M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5410. PubMed ID: 26103500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.