These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3218272)
1. [Spatial attention: objections to the spotlight model of visual selectivity]. Buchner A Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1988; 35(4):523-45. PubMed ID: 3218272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of peripheral visual images in a laterally restricted gaze field. Semmlow JL; Gauthier GM; Vercher JL Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 2326117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty. Beck J Am J Psychol; 1972 Mar; 85(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 5019427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ambiguous figures: role of context and critical features. Goolkasian P J Gen Psychol; 1987 Jul; 114(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 3612106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A test of perceptual enhancement with peripherally presented letter pairs. Chastain G J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jul; 117(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 2213000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Müller MM; Malinowski P; Gruber T; Hillyard SA Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6946):309-12. PubMed ID: 12867981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies. Jacobs AM; Nazir TA; Heller O Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2755768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus versus face recognition in laterally displayed stimuli. Bruyer R; Abdi H; Benoit J Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 3592025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Haptic attention and visual transfer by mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals. Tomiser JM; Hollis JH; Monaco GE Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Jan; 87(4):448-55. PubMed ID: 6829623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cat's form-experienced but visual-motor deprived eye lacks focal vision. Robinson JS; Fish SE Dev Psychobiol; 1974 Jul; 7(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 4424400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Attending to eye movements and retinal eccentricity: evidence for the activity distribution model of attention reconsidered. Turk-Browne NB; Pratt J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1061-6. PubMed ID: 16262498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of intradimensional and extradimensional shifts on visual discrimination learning in humans and non-human primates. Roberts AC; Robbins TW; Everitt BJ Q J Exp Psychol B; 1988 Nov; 40(4):321-41. PubMed ID: 3145534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of a supplementary visual task on intensity threshold during voluntary saccades. Mitrani L; Yakimoff N; Mateeff S Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1972 Nov; 14(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 5083825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task. Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A coherent computational approach to model bottom-up visual attention. Le Meur O; Le Callet P; Barba D; Thoreau D IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 May; 28(5):802-17. PubMed ID: 16640265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast requirements for picture recognition: converging evidence for a spatial frequency hypothesis. Petersik JT J Gen Psychol; 1987 Jul; 114(3):229-47. PubMed ID: 3612107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect. Jordan TR; Patching GR Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vision outside the focus of attention. Braun J; Sagi D Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jul; 48(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 2377439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]