BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32183763)

  • 21. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Schnall M; Malkowicz SB; Tomaszewski JE; Schultz D; Wein A
    Cancer; 1995 May; 75(9):2368-72. PubMed ID: 7536124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results.
    Hünerbein M; Pegios W; Rau B; Vogl TJ; Felix R; Schlag PM
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Nov; 14(11):1005-9. PubMed ID: 11116406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A Case Where Rectal Cancer Ileus Caused Perforation in the Ascending Colon].
    Machida T; Kobayashi M; Sakai K; Hiraoka K; Ichihara T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2016 Nov; 43(12):2286-2288. PubMed ID: 28133297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Value of endorectal coil versus body coil MRI for diagnosis of recurrent pelvic malignancies.
    Huch Böni RA; Meyenberger C; Pok Lundquist J; Trinkler F; Lütolf U; Krestin GP
    Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 8661581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies.
    Schreibmann E; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):595-605. PubMed ID: 15890605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gastrointestinal perforation following blunt abdominal trauma.
    Sule AZ; Kidmas AT; Awani K; Uba F; Misauno M
    East Afr Med J; 2007 Sep; 84(9):429-33. PubMed ID: 18074961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum and pneumomediastinum: rare complications of perforation peritonitis: a case report.
    Hafiani H; Bouknani N; Choukri EM; Saibari RC; Rami A
    J Med Case Rep; 2024 Apr; 18(1):187. PubMed ID: 38627832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stercolith perforation.
    Yasin MM; Nasreen G; Rathore FA; Malik SA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Jul; 22(7):455-7. PubMed ID: 22747868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Colorectal perforation by self-induced hydrostatic pressure: a report of two cases.
    Choi PW
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 44(2):344-8. PubMed ID: 22989698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Iatrogenic colonic perforation by colonoscopy: a fatal complication for patients with a high anesthetic risk.
    Mai CM; Wen CC; Wen SH; Hsu KF; Wu CC; Jao SW; Hsiao CW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2010 Apr; 25(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 19855987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rectal injury by compressed air.
    Avallone S; La Torre M; Meurette G
    J Trauma; 2010 Jan; 68(1):248. PubMed ID: 20065783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Radiological acute diagnosis in suspected perforation of the large intestine].
    Fürst G
    Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr; 2001; 118():307-10. PubMed ID: 11824267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Metallic sewing needle ingestion presenting as acute abdomen.
    Misra S; Jain V; Ahmad F; Kumar R; Kishore N
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(4):540-3. PubMed ID: 23974755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
    Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
    Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
    Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging and clinical methods.
    Huch Böni RA; Boner JA; Debatin JF; Trinkler F; Knönagel H; Von Hochstetter A; Helfenstein U; Krestin GP
    Clin Radiol; 1995 Sep; 50(9):593-600. PubMed ID: 7554732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of prostate distortion by inflatable and rigid endorectal MRI coils in permanent prostate brachytherapy imaging.
    Martin GV; Kudchadker RJ; Bruno TL; Frank SJ; Wang J
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 29169971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unusual rectal perforation--an individualised approach to management.
    Eu KW; Seow-Choen F; Goh HS
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Feb; 35(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 8009289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil.
    Barth BK; Cornelius A; Nanz D; Eberli D; Donati OF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2218-2226. PubMed ID: 27369051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.