These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32184303)

  • 1. Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Shah K; Egan G; Huan LN; Kirkham J; Reid E; Tejani AM
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e032497. PubMed ID: 32184303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis.
    Dwan K; Kirkham JJ; Williamson PR; Gamble C
    BMJ Open; 2013 Jun; 3(6):. PubMed ID: 23794538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process.
    Kirkham JJ; Altman DG; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9810. PubMed ID: 20339557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multivariate meta-analysis helps examine the impact of outcome reporting bias in Cochrane rheumatoid arthritis reviews.
    Frosi G; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Kirkham JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):542-50. PubMed ID: 25537265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials including participants with stroke or transient ischaemic attack: A systematic review.
    Syed M; Martin H; Sena ES; Williamson PR; Al-Shahi Salman R
    Eur Stroke J; 2023 Dec; 8(4):923-931. PubMed ID: 37606096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomedical journals lack a consistent method to detect outcome reporting bias: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Huan LN; Tejani AM; Egan G
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2014 Oct; 39(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 24828874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study.
    Sargeant JM; Reynolds K; Winder CB; O'Connor AM
    Prev Vet Med; 2021 Oct; 195():105472. PubMed ID: 34438246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey.
    Meursinge Reynders R; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):249. PubMed ID: 29216930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists.
    Smyth RM; Kirkham JJ; Jacoby A; Altman DG; Gamble C; Williamson PR
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():c7153. PubMed ID: 21212122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist.
    Li L; Xu C; Deng K; Zhou X; Liu Z; Busse JW; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():125-135. PubMed ID: 30278212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials.
    Krsticevic M; Saric D; Saric F; Slapnicar E; Boric K; Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Kegalj MJ; Puljak L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Nov; 8(15):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 31739691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews.
    Saric F; Barcot O; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():53-58. PubMed ID: 31009658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study.
    Hopewell S; Boutron I; Altman DG; Ravaud P
    BMJ Open; 2013 Aug; 3(8):e003342. PubMed ID: 23975265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
    Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic survey showed important limitations in the methods for assessing drug safety among systematic reviews.
    Li L; Deng K; Busse JW; Zhou X; Xu C; Liu Z; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():80-90. PubMed ID: 32247024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study.
    Page MJ; Higgins JP
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jul; 5(1):108. PubMed ID: 27392044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
    Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design.
    Bertizzolo L; Bossuyt P; Atal I; Ravaud P; Dechartres A
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e028382. PubMed ID: 30940766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.